News   Jan 09, 2025
 98     0 
News   Jan 09, 2025
 270     0 
News   Jan 08, 2025
 1.1K     0 

Globe: City Didn't Clean Up on Trash Bin Ads

A

AlvinofDiaspar

Guest
Since the Eucan thread is no longer available, here is a new one...from the Globe:

City didn't clean up on trash bin ads
Negotiations still on with new owners after company fails to deliver $1-million

JEFF GRAY

Turns out Toronto's troublesome litter and recycling bins -- which annoy some with their advertising and others with their mess -- have another problem: They aren't making enough money.

City officials have been in secret negotiations since last July with the private company that supplies and maintains Toronto's 4,000 silver sidewalk bins -- and makes money off the advertising plastered on them -- after the firm failed to give the city its full $1-million-a-year share of ad revenue. How much it fell short has not been made public.

The headaches over what has been a controversial public-private partnership have become public as the city accepts bids from private firms on a much larger, 20-year deal that will cover thousands of garbage bins, benches, newspaper boxes and transit shelters.

The plan will see the private sector design, build and maintain Toronto's new co-ordinated "street furniture" in exchange for the right to advertise, provided they return some of their ad revenue to the city.

"It's a cautionary tale for us while we are looking at a much larger project," said Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker (Scarborough Centre), chairman of the works committee.

According to a report from city staff released yesterday, city council authorized secret talks with Toronto-based Eucan (Urban Equipment of Canada Inc.) in a closed-door session last July, after the firm said it could no longer afford to honour its 10-year litter-bin contract, signed in 1999.

Eucan, now under new ownership, has offered a confidential settlement whereby it would maintain the bins until its contract ends in 2009, but would fork over less money to the city. How much less, and how much Eucan owes the city, remains secret. Officials have recommended that city council allow terms of the deal to be made public once it is finalized.

Under the original garbage-can deal, Eucan agreed to give the city a guaranteed annual payment of $10 per bin; the payment has since doubled to $20.

It also agreed to hand over an additional 10-per-cent slice of advertising revenue, for a total of about $1-million a year, city officials said. (For the first five years, the firm could defer paying the city its share of the ad revenue.) The Eucan deal apparently soured after city council vetoed the firm's plans to bring in new, 2.3-metre-high billboard-like garbage bins last May. About 80 of the so-called megabins were installed in a pilot project, but critics said they were ugly, took up too much sidewalk space, and were poorly designed. Mayor David Miller, at the time, however, praised them as "brilliant."

Despite the problems, Mr. De Baeremaeker, who also supported the megabins, says he doesn't have a problem with the private-public partnership model.

"City bureaucrats aren't experts at marketing garbage-can ads to Coca-Cola and Chiclets and to Kellogg's Corn Flakes," he said. "So let the private sector, which is really good at marketing, take that over and we'll take a commission."

He said it is important to remember that the company did provide $5-million worth of garbage and recycling bins at no charge, but simply was not able to meet its ad-sales targets.

Late last year, Eucan's Mexican parent, Grupo Eumex -- controlled by a Spanish firm, Cemusa, now bidding on the city's massive street furniture contract -- sold Eucan to a new company based in Caledon called Pro-Kyoto International Inc.

PKI, started by former Magna International executives, officially took over on Jan. 1, cleaning house and putting in its own leadership team.

Craig Marwood, the newly installed president of Eucan, said he plans to speak to the city's works committee next week, to convince them that his firm will be "good stewards" until the contract ends.

Mr. Marwood said his company, to be renamed EcoMedia Direct Inc., will focus first on gradually removing the unpopular megabins from Toronto streets. He said it also promises to launch a cleanup of Toronto bins in the downtown, which he said have not been kept up because of Eucan's problems.

"We're stepping into a company . . . that's financially not in good health," Mr. Marwood said in a phone interview.

He acknowledged that he believed the city is unlikely to cancel the contract, even though Eucan could not live up to its side of the bargain.

"I think that the city's done the right thing to be frank. . . . Would you prefer somebody to pull the boxes off the street, and then what's everybody doing? Scrambling for a solution to clean up the mess," Mr. Marwood said.

Eucan acquired the contract for the city's garbage and recycling bins in 2003 when it bought Concord, Ont.-based OMG Media in 2003.
_________________________________________________

A nice precautionary tale on public-private partnerships.

AoD
 
I agree about the perils of the P3 process. If the city is going to have a design review panel ( one day! ) for buildings, why not have a department to design and co-ordinate all street furniture for the public realm too? We have talented local people who could do it. Better than the design-by-BIA process ( with their mishmash of competing ideas about what different parts of the city should look like ) too, surely?
 
I have no problem with different areas having distinctive "looks", which we largely do not have now. But some standards have to be imposed. I'm certainly glad to read that the ugly "megabins" or whatever they were called will be disappearing. They added nothing to the street landscape, and didn't even do a good job of serving as garbage containers. I don't think I've ever seen one which wasn't overstuffed with garbage.
 
"Pro-Kyoto International Inc. ... started by former Magna International executives"

What an odd name for a company... especially one started by car part manufacturer executives.
 
From the Globe:

Firm pulling 'street furniture' bid

JENNIFER LEWINGTON

CITY HALL BUREAU CHIEF

Just weeks before a key deadline in the city's ambitious efforts to spruce up its "street furniture" over the next 20 years, one high-profile company has pulled out of the competition.

"It is a major, major disappointment, but you have to be able to make a business case," Toulla Constantinou, North America CEO of Cemusa Inc., said yesterday, citing the unprecedented size of the project and city-imposed restrictions that she warns will make it hard for any bidder to turn a profit.

"Considering the quality of service and product we were willing to make, we wouldn't make any money," said Ms. Constantinou, whose company last month won a $1.4-billion deal with New York for new bus shelters, public toilets and newsstands over 20 years.

This latest twist in Toronto's sweeping effort to end the clutter on city streets -- with a unified look for bus shelters, litter bins, newspaper boxes and other amenities in public spaces largely paid for with ads -- comes as the city copes with less-than-expected revenue from a deal to supply and maintain 4,000 sidewalk garbage bins.

As a Jan. 31 deadline looms for the city to hear from potential bidders on the street furniture contract -- worth an estimated $150-million-plus over the 20-year life of the contract -- one other possible bidder might head for the exit too.

"Everybody's got cold feet, and with justification," said an adviser to one company, who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the same concerns as Ms. Constantinou. But not all potential bidders are alarmed.

"We have no intention of backing off from the bid," said Alain Bergeron, vice-president of Astral Media Inc., a Montreal-based company that has a pilot project here for about 25 tourist information pillars.

"We are looking forward to it," he said. "We do not have issues with the financial aspect."

City officials say they are satisfied they are on the right track with their contract, but have made a key change in the terms of the bid.

The original request for proposals (RFP) issued in September said the city expects a "guaranteed minimum annual revenue" of at least $6-million a year or 27 per cent of gross annual advertising revenue, whichever is greater.

But in an addenda to the RFP, filed by the city in response to questions from bidders, the $6-million guaranteed-revenue requirement is no longer a must. That is likely a result of the less-than-expected revenue from the renegotiated litter bin deal announced this week.

Meanwhile, the size of Toronto's proposal is unprecedented, with 25,000 pieces of furniture dwarfing the kind of 20-year deals signed by other cities in North America. For example, the New York project is one of the largest to date, but small by Toronto standards. The New York deal calls for the installation of 3,000 new bus shelters, 20 new public toilets and the replacement of 330 newsstands over a 20-year period.

FUTURE AMENITIES

The proposed street furniture contract, with a total of 25,000 different pieces, would either add to or replace the city's current inventory of about 12,000 amenities.

Over the next 20 years, the proposed contract calls for the installation of:

5,000 transit shelters, up from 4,000;

12,500 litter and recycling bins, up from 6,500;

2,000 benches, up from 1,000;

2,000 multipublication boxes, compared to individual newspaper boxes at present;

120 information pillars. (None exist now except for a pilot project with 25 pillars)

about 20 public washrooms;

up to 2,500 poster kiosks, a completely new format.

AoD
 
Perhaps it is time to take the profit motive out of the equation, and break the cycle of dependency on privatization as a cure-all? If private businesses can't make enough profit off taxpayers, perhaps it is time for the city to take design for the public realm seriously and provide it like other basic services themselves. Designed "in-house", the transit shelters, kiosks, benches and bins will still have to be made, but profit won't be skimmed off of our investment.
 

Back
Top