News   Nov 01, 2024
 2K     13 
News   Nov 01, 2024
 2.4K     3 
News   Nov 01, 2024
 731     0 

FIBERALS RUSH TO SUICIDE Photo radar may return

A

Are Be

Guest
&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp
Jan. 14, 2004. 04:30 PM
McGuinty: Photo radar may return
Mike Harris campaigned, and won, on promise to eliminate it in 1994

KEITH LESLIE
CANADIAN PRESS

The spectre of photo radar returned to haunt Ontario motorists today as the province's cash-strapped government considered reviving the controversial measure to help shrink a $5.6-billion deficit.

Premier Dalton McGuinty said it was one of several ideas for generating revenue and cutting costs that are up for discussion during a two-day cabinet meeting that got underway today.

"I've long been a supporter of photo radar . . . (and) we're going to talk about that," McGuinty said on his way into the meeting.

"It's a revenue generator, absolutely."

Photo radar was first introduced in Ontario in 1994 under Bob Rae's NDP government, but was one of the first things to go when Mike Harris and his Conservatives were elected the following year.

It featured high-tech cameras mounted in unmarked police vans which sat parked by the sides of highways, snapping licence-plate photos of those vehicles that exceeded the speed limit.

Regardless of who was at the wheel, the car's owner would get a copy of the photo in the mail, along with a hefty fine.
# Speak Out: Photo radar

The Canadian Automobile Association said today that photo radar is nothing but a "tax grab" that does nothing to slow speeding drivers.

"This is a tax on motorists," said spokesman Mark Arsenault.

While a marked police cruiser on the side of the road does slow traffic, drivers won't be deterred by receiving a ticket in the mail weeks after speeding past an unmarked photo radar van, Arsenault said.

"The only way that this is going to save lives and improve traffic safety is if there's a deterrent involved," he said.

"Photo radar doesn't provide that."

Since they were elected in October, McGuinty's Liberals have been frantically casting about for ways to trim the provincial deficit, estimated to be more than $5.6 billion.

Consumer and Business Services Minister Jim Watson said officials in his ministry are reviewing nearly 300 fees for "everything from birth certificates to marriage licences to various business permits" in order to generate more money.

"I very much come from a user-pay philosophy," Watson said. ``I've asked my staff to determine what the real cost is (and) what we're charging."

Photo radar remains in place in other Canadian provinces, including Alberta and Manitoba. In British Columbia, Gordon Campbell's Liberals scrapped the measure in 2001.

Ontario's opposition Tories and New Democrats both seized on the issue today, accusing the Liberals of misleading voters during last fall's election campaign by failing to mention photo radar, toll roads or higher user fees.

"The premier's done a complete reversal on photo radar," said NDP house leader Peter Kormos. "He wasn't a fan of it 12 years ago. All of a sudden now McGuinty embraces photo radar."

Conservative critic Garfield Dunlop accused McGuinty of saying anything to voters in order to get elected.

"I think it's fairly clear he's misled Ontarians on a lot of different issues," Dunlop said. "Photo radar, I wouldn't be surprised if he did that as well."


› Get 50% off home delivery of the Toronto Star.
FAQs| Site Map| Privacy Policy| Webmaster| Subscribe| My Subscription
Home| GTA| Business| Waymoresports| A&E| Life
Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.
 
arebes3sm.jpg
 
Keith Leslie doesn't know what he is talking about. Harris won in spite of, rather than because of, his opposition to photo radar. There were plenty of other issues that Harris campaigned on, and to cite photo radar as the main one is pure wishful thinking.

:rollin

It's interesting to note that, in the weeks after Harris took over, it was photo radar that many Ontarians campaigned most strongly to retain. The Harris Tories went through most of Rae's accomplishments, but it was photo radar that made headlines.

Possibly because it actually did make the 401 safer to drive.

...James
 
"While a marked police cruiser on the side of the road does slow traffic, drivers won't be deterred by receiving a ticket in the mail weeks after speeding past an unmarked photo radar van, Arsenault said.

"The only way that this is going to save lives and improve traffic safety is if there's a deterrent involved," he said."

LOL. Tell me whether it is an effective enough deterrent if he recieves a speeding ticket worth 100 bucks every month for the duration of the year.

GB
 
&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp STORY #1
Jan. 16, 2004. 01:00 AM
Editorial: Ca-ching speedsters


Premier Dalton McGuinty has fessed up, and acknowledged what critics have suspected all along: Government sees photo radar as a roadside cash register. Ca-ching.

The Premier is looking at reinstating photo radar because, he freely admits, "it's a revenue generator, absolutely" that will help him raise money to battle Ontario's $5.6 billion deficit.

Ever heard of the expression, doing the right thing for the wrong reason?

Photo radar is good. It works. It slows down drivers, cutting accident rates in jurisdictions where it has been introduced. Speeders' licence plates are snapped by roadside cameras, and the car owners are mailed tickets for hefty fines.

Norway credits photo radar for a 20 per cent reduction in injury crashes.

It should be brought back to Ontario, where it was ditched after a brief run in 1995 by the Mike Harris Conservatives as an election gimmick. The Tories never did explain their reversal.

But raising cash should be a by-product of this policy, not its prime purpose.

Consider, for instance, how decisions will be made on where to place the cameras.

Should the government target high-risk locations, where there have been lots of accidents, hoping to make these spots safer? Or will the cameras be set up where they can raise the most money — on highway off-ramps, for example?

This blurring of the objectives risks making the whole exercise suspect.

Relying on scofflaws to pay the province's bills doesn't strike us as sound fiscal policy.

Moreover, good as photo radar is, it is not a substitute for real police on our highways.

The cameras won't stop drivers from tailgating, making dangerous lane changes, or drag racing.

A marked police cruiser on the highway slows traffic, whereas there is not much deterrence to speeding when drivers receive a ticket in the mail weeks after the offence. And speeders' insurance companies won't be notified so no one will lose demerit points.

McGuinty should get the priorities straight. In deploying officers — or radar vans — the top priority must be public safety, not cash.

› Get 50% off home delivery of the Toronto Star.
FAQs| Site Map| Privacy Policy| Webmaster| Subscribe| My Subscription
Home| GTA| Business| Waymoresports| A&E| Life
Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.

STORY#2
 

Back
Top