Toronto Eglinton Line 5 Crosstown West Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

Dead wrong, with single bore they just need to cut a few meter of the station from the top to lower the equipment and everything can be done underground. No need to cut the intersection at all. It's similar to the mined stations at Laird and Oakwood which they didn't even touch the intersection. The entire platform can fit inside the tunnel unlike the crosstown where they have to destroy the bored tunnel liners. The few meters they cut would become the entrances to the station.

It is especially important to keep intersections like Eg/Martin Grove flowing or traffic will back up onto the 401/427.

If you read the Design Plates from this link, you'll see that the underground station platforms will be approximately 20±m below the surface.

1600274901600.png


1600274944969.png

1600274966709.png

1600274996281.png

1600275022466.png
 
Is it written in "stone" that platform screen doors will be installed on the Line 5 Eglinton West LRT extension?

The Montréal REM line has it so...

Safe and reliable technology

The REM technology is fully automated, 100% electric light rail. Trains are driverless, directed by a control centre that ensures proper functioning of equipment at all times. The platforms will be protected by screen doors that only open after the train has arrived; users cannot cross the tracks or drop objects onto them. This type of automated system is one of the safest and most reliable in the world.

Or will the penny-pinchers non-transit using politicians say "NO!"?


Maybe strange if they install the screen doors on extension but "forgot" to install them on the "original" Line 5.
 
Last edited:
Is it written in "stone" that platform screen doors will be installed on the Line 5 Eglinton West LRT extension?

The Montréal REM line has it so...



Or will the penny-pinchers non-transit using politicians say "NO!"?


Maybe strange if they install the screen doors on extension but "forgot" to install them on the "original" Line 5.

There are 0 indications that the EWLRT will get platform screen doors. The line will be highly automated and can support it, but the gov isn't really targetting it for the crosstown.
 
No one said there will be platform edge doors. Should there be? Yes, and honestly we're spending billions to tunnel this monstrosity, PSDs actually save lives and improve reliability!
I only agree with PSDs would improve reliability and prevent accidents/murders. Mentally ill people will still find other ways to end their life if they don't receive support.

OL will have PSDs since it is very problematic to operate fully automated trains without them. Line 5 will be crewed so they'll likely cheap out on PSDs.
 
Vancouver operates fully automatic trains without PSDs. There are definitely operational benefits, but it is not a requirement for automation.
Every fully automated line built in the last 20 years has platform screen doors. (well other than the Canada Line and some lines in India)
Montreal Metro has funding to test and implement Platform screen doors at some stations.
The reason why the Skytrain doesnt have PSDs at the moment is because they are using 3 different rolling stock with different door placements. That wont be as much a problem as the Mark Is are phased out soon enough.
 
"But to Cameron MacLeod, director of transit advocacy group CodeRedTO, the emphasis on sooner journeys and fewer stops unfairly favours long-distance riders over extra local residents.

“We’re spending a lot of money for far fewer stops, which means this will be more convenient for someone who wants to go through Etobicoke than it will be for someone who lives in Etobicoke,” he stated."

Except isn't this the point? The point of the extension is to A) Get people from Etobicoke to other locations in Toronto, either Midtown or Downtown. B) Get people from Mississauga into Toronto, to either Midtown, or Downtown through Mt. Dennis, and C), funnel locals into Pearson Airport. We shouldn't be building LRTs to be replacements for busses, because we already have busses that do the job of local transportation. The entire point of Rapid Transit especially at this scale is to be a middle-ground between local and long distance transportation.
 
The underground plan is much better in general. (Building it as a subway instead of a St. Clair Streetcar)
The only thing I wish they did was to study an elevated alignment. In Vancouver, they are planning/building a Skytrain extension for 16km tracks/8 stations for 3.1B. And they have even less space to work with than on Eglinton West.
 
Last edited:
Here is the original article. The one posted above seems to be translated to Spanish and back to English or something. The language is very off.
Must've been a slow day at the Toronto Star.
 

Back
Top