News   Feb 05, 2026
 270     0 
News   Feb 05, 2026
 1K     1 
News   Feb 05, 2026
 562     0 

A lesson in Taxes

M

mpolo2

Guest
I'm not sure how dated this is, but the basic premis is pretty clear and seemed relevant what with taxes due and an election coming:
------------------------------------------------------

A brief lesson in economics:

Subject: Taxes


Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.


So, that's what they decided to do.


The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until on day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20."Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20,"declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.



David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.

Professor of Economics University of Georgia
 
Wow. Thank you for finding such a clear demonstration why analogies are useless.

Reducing the cost of beer, for instance, tends to happen more like this:

Either the four who don't pay stop getting beer or everyone gets crappier beer, but those that can afford the good stuff buy it outside of the arrangement.

The bartender isn't generous. Sure, there might be waste, and spilling some of the beer when pouring the pitcher benefits no one, but once the spillage is eliminated, cutting spending on beer takes beer out of someone's glass.

Oh, analogies....
 
The beer gets cheaper but suddenly everyone has to pay a cover charge...
 
Or the last three men would discover that they could save good amounts of money if they just stopped giving the first five free beer, and since they tended to sit at the other end of the table and not associate much with the low-income folks very much they decide that they're not really missing out on anything if they just go off and form their own group.
 
One day the richest person at the table realizes, even if they continually cut the price of the beer for me, I can always go to another bar and pay even less for my beer, and not have to worry about subsidizing the nine other pieces of scum.
 
The 10th guy leaves the group to join up with other 10th guys from other groups, who start ordering champagne- cheers!
 
The true story is that the richest guy actually owns the bar. he knows how much he is paying wholesale and he knows he's still making a profit on the sale of the beer to his friends. The money he pays for beer goes into the cash register and straight back into his pocket. He discusses beer with his friends while they drink said beer which makes their drinking sessions a business meeting and allows his accountant to write off the beer as an expense.

also, he pays his bartender and waitresses shitty wages and doesn't provide them with health insurance or a pension plan. he would happily replace them with cheaper foreign bar staff at the first opportunity.

the richest guy also owns the horse and the water.
 
sort of related to this thread:

Income gap widens
TAVIA GRANT

Globe and Mail Update

May 3, 2007 at 10:51 AM EDT

The gap between Canadian families with the lowest and highest incomes has widened over the past decade, a government report said Thursday.

Statistics Canada divided families into five groups to analyze income inequality. It found that the difference between the top fifth and the bottom fifth quintile hit $105,400 in 2005 — up by almost a third from levels in the mid-1990s.

Average after-tax income was $128,200 for the top fifth of high income families in 2005 compared with $22,800 for the 20 per cent with the lowest income.

“Though all quintiles benefited from the positive economic conditions that prevailed since the early 1990s, families in the top one-fifth gained the most,†the report said. “Since 1996, their average after-tax income rose 24 per cent compared with about 18 per cent for the other quintiles.â€

Internet Links
Statscan: Read the report
At the same time though, the rich are paying a greater share of federal taxes. The wealthiest fifth of families and individuals collectively paid almost 60 per cent of all personal income taxes that year — up from 50 per cent in 1980.

“This change reflects, in part, increases in their share of total after-tax income and the redistributive nature of Canada's personal income tax systems,†Statscan said.

Overall, the median after-tax income for Canadian families with two or more people was $56,000 in 2005, 1.6-per-cent higher than a year earlier, after adjusting for inflation. Most families saw their incomes rise, except for senior families and unattached individuals.

Albertan families continued to be the wealthiest in the country, for the second year running.
 

Back
Top