News   Jan 27, 2021
 290     0 
News   Jan 27, 2021
 553     1 
News   Jan 27, 2021
 1.7K     7 

46-54 Ossington Ave (Hullmark, 3s, Audax)

AlbertC

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
13,143
Reaction score
24,710
Location
Davenport
Conversion of the current residential properties to commercial usage:

https://www.hullmark.ca/4654-ossington-1

jgh_ossington_final_3_colour_2_email.jpg

18008-01.jpg
 

Attachments

  • jgh_ossington_final_3_colour_2_email.jpg
    jgh_ossington_final_3_colour_2_email.jpg
    302 KB · Views: 2,390
  • 18008-01.jpg
    18008-01.jpg
    329.4 KB · Views: 1,985

ADRM

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
5,195
Reaction score
13,538
These three buildings are finally slated to get some retail use; CoA minor variance submitted in September.

Screen Shot 2018-11-24 at 1.30.17 PM.png


Screen Shot 2018-11-24 at 1.31.07 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-11-24 at 1.31.17 PM.png
 

innsertnamehere

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
14,904
Reaction score
10,109
Interesting how Hullmark is starting to buy up a lot of the Ossington Strip - I wonder if this stretch will become a bit blander and more "curated" as a single landowner starts to own a good chunk of the street.
 

concrete_and_light

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 27, 2018
Messages
387
Reaction score
822
Love to see this type of conversion! So many of our main streets have buildings like this without anything active at street level and this type of human-scale mixed use is very welcome.
 

Froggy

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
658
Reaction score
1,120
Location
Davenport
More details from this link.

Hullmark recently acquired the row of residential houses located between 46 and 54 Ossington Avenue and the idea is to renovate these to create an innovative mix of retail at grade with office space proposed above. Mr. Damji explained that the development will help bridge that part of the street by extending the retail that characterizes the street on either side. A whimsical illustration has created interest in the development. Renovation of the existing buildings are slated for next year with delivery for possession in the open market by the end of 2019.
 

jje1000

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
2,272
I personally would love more of this happening throughout the core and inner city. This small-scale adaptive reuse was something that has always happened in Toronto, but was only zoned out in the last 60 years.
 

Towered

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
5,754
Reaction score
3,975
I personally would love more of this happening throughout the core and inner city. This small-scale adaptive reuse was something that has always happened in Toronto, but was only zoned out in the last 60 years.

Absolutely, it was stupid to ever end that. All those Victorians lining streets like Dufferin, Bathurst, etc should be converted to retail.
 

ADRM

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
5,195
Reaction score
13,538
There are a bunch of fairly recent CoA applications supporting Hullmark's redevelopment of the SFHs between 46 and 54 Ossington. Hullmark is doing great stuff right now, and I quite like their vision for this stretch of Ossington -- very happy to see this.


Type: Retail/Residential/Office
Retail and Office Space: 15,000 sf
Residential Space: 3,000 sf

jgh_ossington_final_3_colour_2_email.jpg
 

chuckles

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
26
Reaction score
68
This would be such a great thing for this bit of the strip. Not a huge change, but would fill that bin in nicely.

It is a residential to commercial conversion, though, which I know can be a challenge to get through the city.
 

innsertnamehere

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
14,904
Reaction score
10,109
This would be such a great thing for this bit of the strip. Not a huge change, but would fill that bin in nicely.

It is a residential to commercial conversion, though, which I know can be a challenge to get through the city.
it's fine as it's zoned for it already - the variances are only for built form modifications.
 

Top