Toronto 35 Holmes | 58.24m | 17s | Maniad | Icon

PMT

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
8,585
Location
Turanna
35 HOLMES AVE
Ward 23 - North York District

►View All Properties

Combined Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendment

Proposed Use --- # of Storeys 18 # of Units 154


Applications:
Type Number Date Submitted Status
OPA & Rezoning 18 104519 NNY 23 OZ Jan 12, 2018 Under Review
 
It's about time.

Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at Friday Jan 19, 2018 11.48.15 AM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at Friday Jan 19, 2018 11.48.15 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at Friday Jan 19, 2018 11.48.15 AM.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 1,133
I'm not liking the blank walls at all:

upload_2018-1-26_16-35-50.png


upload_2018-1-26_16-36-23.png


upload_2018-1-26_16-37-2.png


upload_2018-1-26_16-37-22.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-26_16-35-50.png
    upload_2018-1-26_16-35-50.png
    85 KB · Views: 1,282
  • upload_2018-1-26_16-36-23.png
    upload_2018-1-26_16-36-23.png
    94.4 KB · Views: 1,251
  • upload_2018-1-26_16-37-2.png
    upload_2018-1-26_16-37-2.png
    81.5 KB · Views: 1,130
  • upload_2018-1-26_16-37-22.png
    upload_2018-1-26_16-37-22.png
    95.1 KB · Views: 1,270

Attachments

  • view-4-6.jpg
    view-4-6.jpg
    184.5 KB · Views: 1,202
  • view-2-8.jpg
    view-2-8.jpg
    163.8 KB · Views: 1,199
  • view-3-4.jpg
    view-3-4.jpg
    174.4 KB · Views: 1,196
  • view-1-2.jpg
    view-1-2.jpg
    134.6 KB · Views: 1,163
One thing is certain here; this doesnt look like it will be Iconic in any way, shape, or form.
 
New docs posted February 8:


Revised proposal for LPAT hearing: a 17-storey residential building with a 2-level underground parking garage total GFA of 10.717.30m2 (FSI 4.51) with a 96 vehicle parking spaces. Note, the tower with shift slightly to the east to increase the west side yard setback to 10 metres.

1619282640261.png


1619282662148.png
 
Shame the developer was unable to purchase that house--would have made for a better parcel. That owner missed their chance to sell. When this building goes up, their house will lose its development potential. Its value also takes a hit in the eyes of anyone in the market for a detached house. Not exactly fun being right beside a large building with windows staring into your backyard.
 

From the decision:

The Appellant has also agreed to a commitment for traffic demand measures and a contribution of $50,000
towards a bicycle sharing initiative.


Not sure if this is something novel, or funding for a Bikeshare Toronto station.

*****

This is the sort of thing that gets the City in trouble:

1628624102543.png


The set-back was being asked for next to a site on which a tall building is not feasible.
 

Back
Top