There will still be one lot under the power lines to the northeast of the station. Otherwise, go to a parking lot at Kipling, or get to the station by bus or some other method. There's no reason why we should be holding developable land as surface parking at a subway station.sucks , this would mean no more free parking on the weekend at Islington station with this development for anyone who wants to go downtown
60+ floors is really pushing it, but yes more density should be a given here.Thrilled to finally see some movement on this, as the current state of the site has been an eyesore for decades. I agree with the other comments however that the density is a bit on the light side considering the location. All the proposed tower heights are less than the towers right across the tracks - how is that justified? If anything, 60 floors or more would be appropriate here. Why does the city always lowball this kind of stuff?
60+ floors is really pushing it, but yes more density should be a given here.
I wonder if it even is anymore. If this was in private hands, they would be pushing for 50 storeys directly on top of the station for sure.60+ floors is really pushing it, but yes more density should be a given here.
At least we're not going to be building the next Kowloon Walled City, which was the most densely populated neighbourhood in all of human history, though it was later demolished. It was the king of all slums.Just please don't repeat Hong Kong's mistake - that 90% of the residential buildings are soul-destroyingly boring and hideous.
yeah i know what you mean it's a great plan , i use free GO station parking now , hopefully they don't do this at GO stations , you have to be a driver to understandThere will still be one lot under the power lines to the northeast of the station. Otherwise, go to a parking lot at Kipling, or get to the station by bus or some other method. There's no reason why we should be holding developable land as surface parking at a subway station.
42
60+ floors is really pushing it, but yes more density should be a given here.