News   Dec 12, 2025
 676     0 
News   Dec 12, 2025
 1.6K     6 
News   Dec 12, 2025
 753     0 

300 Dufferin (TCHC, 7s, ?)

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
40,932
Reaction score
126,367
Location
Toronto/EY
The above is an existing TCHC property.

It is heading towards a massive retrofit/rebuild (retaining the existing bones, mostly) with a budget that is not public, except that it exceeds 10M.

It came to my attention via this report to today's TCHC Board Mtg:


The extent of the rehab is more than substantive, it includes total facade replacement (brick and windows), tenant relocation is required, new HVAC, and a variety of interior works such as all-new flooring.

This has me very suspicious about whether this is the right course of action of this site.

There is a height precedent for 19s literally across the street from this complex. The TCHC Assembly here is two parcels, adjacent to one another that also includes lowrise townhomes.

Aerial view of the consolidated TCHC sites here:

1765479304793.png


The combine area is ~60,000ft2

You could just replace the 7s with 19s; but to me, the play here would to create a new mid-rise immediately behind a townhome facade on Gwynne, and then go hirise on the Dufferin frontage.

I'd be curious on a back-of-the-envelope take from some UT'ers such as @ProjectEnd and @ADRM as to where the value lies here (in saving the existing structure with a 3 year plus project or in rebuilding and densifying)

Existing mid-rise fronting Dufferin:

1765479559019.png


Existing townhomes fronting Gwynne:

1765479625617.png


@HousingNowTO may also have thoughts here.
 
Though I am sympathetic to the "we should do more retrofits because of the embodied carbon implications" argument, this seems to me to be a pretty obvious instance where a teardown and rebuild would make more sense. If it's currently envisioned as a 3-year project, you basically have to assume it's 4 minimum, at which point you're not really saving any time from a ground-up rebuild (and, as NL said, there is ample planning justification for significant height/density here).
 
The above is an existing TCHC property.

It is heading towards a massive retrofit/rebuild (retaining the existing bones, mostly) with a budget that is not public, except that it exceeds 10M.

It came to my attention via this report to today's TCHC Board Mtg:


The extent of the rehab is more than substantive, it includes total facade replacement (brick and windows), tenant relocation is required, new HVAC, and a variety of interior works such as all-new flooring.

This has me very suspicious about whether this is the right course of action of this site.

There is a height precedent for 19s literally across the street from this complex. The TCHC Assembly here is two parcels, adjacent to one another that also includes lowrise townhomes.

Aerial view of the consolidated TCHC sites here:

View attachment 702154

The combine area is ~60,000ft2

You could just replace the 7s with 19s; but to me, the play here would to create a new mid-rise immediately behind a townhome facade on Gwynne, and then go hirise on the Dufferin frontage.

I'd be curious on a back-of-the-envelope take from some UT'ers such as @ProjectEnd and @ADRM as to where the value lies here (in saving the existing structure with a 3 year plus project or in rebuilding and densifying)

Existing mid-rise fronting Dufferin:

View attachment 702155

Existing townhomes fronting Gwynne:

View attachment 702157

@HousingNowTO may also have thoughts here.
Adding to the watch-list
 

Back
Top