ChesterCopperpot
Senior Member
Last edited by a moderator:
|
|
|
250 Front St. E (Greenpark Homes, 12 + 2x 46s, SvN)
- Thread starter M5A
- Start date
innsertnamehere
Superstar
ugh.
Towered
Senior Member
We've all eagerly wanted that awful suburban Staples to go for many years, but...
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
UrbanFervour
Active Member
What an absolute bummer if this gets built (with that massing).
The surrounding area calls for the street scale & materiality of the distillery & king east.
The surrounding area calls for the street scale & materiality of the distillery & king east.
88drums
Active Member
This site deserves so, so much better than G+C
UrbanFervour
Active Member
Almost EVERY site deserves better than G+C They should be confined to only the most utilitarian of industrial parks.
;p
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Lenser
Senior Member
Man, that blocky, institutional mess reminds me of some 60s-era hospital wing.
jaybe
Active Member
I work at King and Parliament and walk past this site daily. It impressed me as an amazing location to do something very interesting because there are views straight down King into the core. This proposal doesn't leverage the layout of the location at all.
PMT
Senior Member
Amare
Senior Member
I'd rather have the Staples store in its current form, than see this hulky G+C inspired mess going up.
stjames2queenwest
Senior Member
What’s with all these clunkers in the area? Do they end up like this because of height restrictions? So the developer tries to make as dense as possible?
PMT
Senior Member
Preliminary Report: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-112594.pdf
lead82
Senior Member
Why is it that the city allows buildings where almost 2/3 of units are tiny 1 bedrooms when there is a huge demand for family sized units. Why not force developers to have more 2 bedroom and 3 bedroom units. It should be 1/3 1 bedroom, 1/3 2 bedroom and 1/3 3 bedrooms.