steveintoronto
Superstar
Apologies, missed this post before.Why not? But any "vision" that doesn't include increasing revenues would fail, because our debt was not caused by excessive spending. All figures point to that.
The only thing I am expecting from Conservatives is reduced spending, and that would be a disaster.
"because our debt was not caused by excessive spending. All figures point to that." I agree with the gist of spending *at this time*, depending on the nature of it, but the A-G's report and others' indicate the multiplier value of that spending is neutral or less. I suspect some others will join that line of debate here, so let's revisit this particular point later?
She's certainly proving that! I won't even go as far as to state that we've had bad government. Until now, I couldn't see anyone being better (which is a pretty low bar, but hey...)Wynne is disliked by many, but I also think she's underestimated as both a politician and a campaigner.
But let's all (or most of us) agree that the field has changed radically, and is probably about to change ever further.
I don't care what 'perfume' it is, anything is better than the fusty smell of incumbency as it is. Wynne is actually a higher point in her own cabinet!
Mulroney would get my vote for no other reason than for *capable change*. And she'd pick her cabinet well, the aforementioned Elliot amongst them, I'm sure. I still have doubts that Caroline can wear the boots heavy enough to deal with the outliers though. She's going to need a tough Whip to deal with them. We'll see, investment banking is hardly the game of ballet dancers.
Last edited: