|
|
|
Search results
-
GO Transit: Service thread (including extensions)
I 100% agree. The original 21s were very convenient for a number of reasons for me. I wish GO would at least compromise and run a half lakeshore half original operation depending on time of the day. I literally see 0 reason to run the lakeshore ones after 8-9pm when traffic is not nearly as bad...- peelregionrails
- Post #21,458
- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure
-
GO Transit: Service thread (including extensions)
The thing is, we already have a REALLY solid connection from the 407 to the lakeshore in the form of GO bus # 56, which is Oshawa - Oakville via the 407 corridor. And it’s a route I undoubtedly utilize a lot. But I especially find route 21C to be the most redundant as the corridor it utilizes is...- peelregionrails
- Post #21,224
- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure
-
GO Transit: Service thread (including extensions)
Can someone tell me why GO has decided to butcher the 21 route due to “traffic” but the 16 bus (which is probably the easiest bus on the system to convert into a train) gets to stay? I used to use the 21 from union to square one a ton and I have never found the traffic westbound to be bad after...- peelregionrails
- Post #21,157
- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure
