News   Dec 05, 2025
 715     2 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 2.3K     4 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 477     0 

Search results

  1. M

    Toronto 1910 Yonge | 177.49m | 53s | Davpart | Graziani + Corazza

    Amazing the trend in seeking density. Looks like Yonge & Davisville is trying to become the new Yonge & Egg. This proposal at N/W corner is seeking higher density than the N/W corner of Yonge & Egg. They should at least have tried to step back the podium to allow more sidewalk/pops/outdoor...
  2. M

    Toronto 2010 Yonge | 64.13m | 15s | Sud Group | Graziani + Corazza

    Anyone know how long does it typically takes for the applicant's supporting documents to be available on the city's development application website?
  3. M

    Toronto Leaside Common | 32.16m | 9s | Gairloch | BDP Quadrangle

    Yes, certainly Tim, but this buidling is unusally wide (103M). If your home was located on Mann, close to the the center of this proposed building, I think you would have a legitimate beef. I also believe the depth of the lots on Forrest Hill Rd are deeper than Mann, giving additional setback...
  4. M

    Toronto Leaside Common | 32.16m | 9s | Gairloch | BDP Quadrangle

    I agree that assembling additional land along Mann would be complex and expensive for the developer, but I think that is exactly what they should have done. They stand to make millions on this development, so it makes sense that they should work with their neighbours who they are impacting...
  5. M

    Toronto Leaside Common | 32.16m | 9s | Gairloch | BDP Quadrangle

    I don't think anyone should have major issues with the integration along Bayview. It makes much more sense than what currently exists from a efficiency/planning standpoint. I do, however, believe the community's concerns are completely legit. If I owned a house on Mann, backing onto this...

Back
Top