Search results

I'm trying to remember a comparable project that was so (nearly) unanimously disliked on UT. :-)

New project in Leslieville. ZBA filed. Post Lofts 1249 & 1251 Queen St. East 29 units (1 and 2 bedrooms) Midrise - 6 storeys with retail frontage Condoman Developments Icon Architects design

North end now as tall as the topped out south end.

South end is getting close to full height (1 floor left I think?).

Short timelapse

I look forward to flying one of these jets out of Pearson.

Thanks!

Is this where Second City is? (and what's to happen with them?)

I like that the building had its corners cut to allow light on the the existing buildings to the north and east... but its too bad that its largely for naught given that the NOW site is going to block it.

There was a rezoning and a variance? That's unusual.

Which ones were going higher? The Jarvis-Church stretch are all sub-50 I thought? I wonder if they got the floorplates under 750 as a compromise at least.

Apply for 46 and settle for 52? Not sure how that makes sense.

I would guess that was a very strong consideration.

Its time to get that Harvey's heritage designation report filed.

It's like something has gone horribly wrong with the building and the light feature is a desperate cry for help. But that's totally not the case, of course. Nope, not at all.

Yeah, they don't seem to be budging on that (good)

I only found one reference to them in a staff report, but only in questions raised (not answered in the subsequent section).

http://urbantoronto.ca/news/2013/08/loblaws-thinking-big-lake-shore-and-bathurst "The existing billboards on the building, which also have heritage protection (not shown above, but visible in the image below) would be replaced in their current locations." The existing billboards were to be...

I think its ridiculous that they were designated... however, they WERE designated so I'm curious how the developer and the city are dealing with it. Will it just be a Ryerson "yeah, we just ignored that requirement" solution, or have they been relieved of their obligations formally?