Search results

This was considered during the Transit City studies for the Don Mills LRT. There are problems. First, the bridge does not have a lower deck like the Viaduct. Here is a view of the structure from the DVP...

Metrolinx has sent many conflicting signals about property that will be affected as opposed to "taken". They are evasive about land they might occupy (having to tear down the current trees, etc) in order to build on their corridor. When they show finished versions of the line these do not reveal...

Metrolinx explicitly did not want intersection names for stations, and that's why we have so many stations with odd-seeming names rather than the more obvious xx-Eglinton construction.

When I see things like that where the "look" is very professional, but the content is way off the mark, I can't help wondering if there is a very misguided client and an equally misguided professional planner, or just a fan who is good at assembling images, The problem is that this type of thing...

I don't know what alignment study these folks were using, but they have at least two stations in the wrong locations. King/Bathurst shows a north-south tunnel alignment that has been changed in current designs. The obvious errors in so recent a document cannot be explained by timing, only by...

The last reconstruction was done in 2000. There are photos of it in my April 2020 article: https://stevemunro.ca/2020/04/18/planned-changes-to-king-queen-roncesvalles-and-the-queensway-for-2021/ (scroll down to the gallery at the end).

You're welcome! I used to have an account and posted here years ago, but got tired of the trolls and concentrated on my own site.

With the lockdown, I have not been out and about the city as I usually would to document this project, Thanks for the wonderful, extensive coverage!