News   Sep 17, 2021
 4.6K     11 
News   Sep 17, 2021
 895     1 
News   Sep 17, 2021
 1.4K     3 

Search results

  1. M

    Toronto | Rush Condos | 44.96m | 15s | Alterra | BDP Quadrangle

    I am more concerned about the grey spandrel upper portion
  2. M

    Toronto | Queen & Ashbridge | 60.15m | 17s | Context Development | Teeple Architects

    Not as bad as Aura 2.0 being built in Leslieville
  3. M

    Toronto | 160 Front West | 239.87m | 46s | Cadillac Fairview | AS + GG

    Welcome to Panem. May the odds be ever in your favour
  4. M

    Toronto | 88 Queen | 163.05m | 51s | St Thomas Dev | Hariri Pontarini

    Unfortunately they were taken with a phone camera. I can probably get a better "now" one at the beginning of October!
  5. M

    Toronto | 88 Queen | 163.05m | 51s | St Thomas Dev | Hariri Pontarini

    Moving out of my apartment and had to say goodbye.... October 1, 2016 August 30, 2020
  6. M

    Toronto | East FiftyFive | 83.21m | 24s | Lamb Development | architectsAlliance

    I have heard that at least one of his buildings does not have a tri-sorter because it cost too much money to install. The tri-sorting buttons are on the chute door, but there is only one bin at the bottom.
  7. M

    Toronto | 88 Queen | 163.05m | 51s | St Thomas Dev | Hariri Pontarini

    Working after 6pm on weekdays now.
  8. M

    Toronto | Yonge & Rich Condominiums | 156.35m | 46s | Great Gulf | a—A

    I can't say that I have ever seen balcony glass installed before the window wall.
  9. M

    Toronto | Garden District Condos | 99.97m | 32s | Hyde Park | architectsAlliance

    Taken from an uber on Saturday...
  10. M

    Toronto | Fleur Condos | 85.34m | 29s | Menkes | a—A

    They have started to install cladding on the east and south sides.
  11. M

    Toronto | 15 Chisholm | ?m | 6s | Katalyst | BNKC

    LOL well that is a whole other discussion ?
  12. M

    Toronto | 15 Chisholm | ?m | 6s | Katalyst | BNKC

    I kinda disagree. The architect trades off on design to be "sensitive" to the heritage and the heritage basically is destroyed. The City should allow additional floors on the condition the heritage is better preserved or have the developer pay for removing the heritage which hopefully results...
  13. M

    Toronto | 15 Chisholm | ?m | 6s | Katalyst | BNKC

    The design is pure facadism and not even sensitive (see 426 University Ave). The architect might be able to design a better building without the building there and they are not really preserving any of the heritage. They are even chopping off the cornice line. Why not cut the heritage building...
  14. M

    Toronto | 15 Chisholm | ?m | 6s | Katalyst | BNKC

    At that point, why bother keeping anything of the building?!

Top