News   Mar 05, 2026
 641     0 
News   Mar 05, 2026
 1.4K     4 
News   Mar 05, 2026
 528     0 

The coming $26 billion windfall for the Canadian Armed Forces. What to buy?

Hopefully there aren't some unintended consequences with the new national defense strategy to buy Canadian. The Pentagon mostly considers Canadian suppliers as domestic and allows them to compete with U.S. firms. They could respond with similar measures.
Good point, the US is unsurprisingly the largest export customer (two-thirds of exports, one-third of industry output - double check my maths)

The latest stats that I can find from Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada: State of Canada's Defence Industry 2024. The Globe article lists the sectors that the government is singling out, so the doubling is not across the board.

Potentially, a good idea, but will have to see plenty of thought given to upstream elements, skills, private investment, infrastructure supply chains, etc., etc. Plus, many other national defence industries - potential competitors- are gearing up at the same time (e.g. EU). Ultimate success will require a generation of effort (and money) and, crucially, support across party lines that defence is a priority.
 
Hopefully there aren't some unintended consequences with the new national defense strategy to buy Canadian. The Pentagon mostly considers Canadian suppliers as domestic and allows them to compete with U.S. firms. They could respond with similar measures.
Here are the top defence firms in Canada.


Much of this is US sub subsidiary work, and might as well be considered US domestic.
 

Increasing Canadian defence exports is well and good, provided we don’t count in our success metrics those of wholly-US owned subsidiaries operating in Canada, such as GDLS Canada and Lockheed-Martin Canada.

Company ownership is not in the strategy. Workshare and IP ownership are. So LMC building the CMS330 and selling it from Canada will be seen as Canadian.
 
Here are the top defence firms in Canada.


Much of this is US sub subsidiary work, and might as well be considered US domestic.
One of the reasons why Trump thinks they own us...
 
The government cares about jobs and spending in the economy. Not about where profits go.
Contracts with and exports from the likes of Lockheed-Martin Canada and GDLS Canada may lead to more jobs and investment in Canada, but that’s not what Canadians have in mind when Carney sells the idea of separation from the US defence establishment.
 
Last edited:
Contracts with and exports from the likes of Lockheed-Martin Canada and GDLS Canada may lead to more jobs and investment in Canada, but that’s not what Canadians have in mind when Carney sells the idea of separation from the US defence establishment.

I honestly believe that Canadians are mostly talk and care about jobs than anything else.
 

The Welland yard have done some repair and refit work for the navy, but I think it's a stretch for Ontario to build anything for the RCN. AFAIK, Ontario shipyards have not built a warship or any vessel for the RCN since WW2. Here's some interesting history of Toronto's wartime shipyard. Fifty-Six Minesweepers and the Toronto Shipbuilding Company during the Second World War
 
Last edited:

The Welland yard have done some repair and refit work for the navy, but I think it's a stretch for Ontario to build anything for the RCN. AFAIK, Ontario shipyards have not built a warship or any vessel for the RCN since WW2. Here's some interesting history of Toronto's wartime shipyard. Fifty-Six Minesweepers and the Toronto Shipbuilding Company during the Second World War
From what little I know about the industry, there is a significant difference between a build yard and a repair yard. Because of the boom-bust nature of large shipbuilding in Canada (which is largely government contracts, the federal government has already tossed a lot of money at coastal shipyards just to get them in shape for modern shipbuilding. Add onto that, anything that gets built in the Great Lakes has to be Seaway max in dimensions unless they can convince them they can be build modules that can be shipped to a coast - somehow.
 
From what little I know about the industry, there is a significant difference between a build yard and a repair yard. Because of the boom-bust nature of large shipbuilding in Canada (which is largely government contracts, the federal government has already tossed a lot of money at coastal shipyards just to get them in shape for modern shipbuilding. Add onto that, anything that gets built in the Great Lakes has to be Seaway max in dimensions unless they can convince them they can be build modules that can be shipped to a coast - somehow.
All valid points but the last. The largest warship operated by the RCN, the aircraft carrier HMCS Bonaventure would fit down the Seaway with room to spare.

 

The Welland yard have done some repair and refit work for the navy, but I think it's a stretch for Ontario to build anything for the RCN. AFAIK, Ontario shipyards have not built a warship or any vessel for the RCN since WW2. Here's some interesting history of Toronto's wartime shipyard. Fifty-Six Minesweepers and the Toronto Shipbuilding Company during the Second World War
In theory, something the size of the River class could navigate the St Lawrence Seaway. Maybe not the craziest idea to build for the Navy in say Hamilton. Large industrial workforce and proximity to steelmaking.
 
Sure. If the rate of shipbuilding needs to rise, I don't see why we should discount doing some of it in Ontario, given that this is the country's industrial heartland.
 

Back
Top