News   Jan 09, 2025
 1.4K     2 
News   Jan 09, 2025
 451     0 
News   Jan 09, 2025
 1.3K     0 

Mayor Olivia Chow's Toronto

We held an event at Dufferin Grove in October and it seemed manageable at the time.
Even had a neighborhood group come out and ask us for our support in letting the encampment stay in the park.
 
In early November I used the City's new online portal to register that our home is not vacant. Very simple to do and they email a 'receipt".

Yesterday, we received a (personalised) letter (Canada Post) from the City telling us to register.

So much for having improved and simplified the registration process and another waste of money!
 
Infrastructure nerds will be happy to see that the City has updated TOInView to show 2026 projects. https://map.toronto.ca/toinview/ Though there are very few 2026 (only) projects added yet!

Sadly, in checking with staff..........looking at many of the December '24 updates that had various projects happening in 2025.........

I'm told TOInview's accuracy.......remains a problem.
 
Sadly, in checking with staff..........looking at many of the December '24 updates that had various projects happening in 2025.........

I'm told TOInview's accuracy.......remains a problem.
It has certainly never been very 'forward thinking' for utility projects but in the past they have been pretty good at listing major City and TTC projects - though often not getting the year just added fully 'populated' for several months.
 
In early November I used the City's new online portal to register that our home is not vacant. Very simple to do and they email a 'receipt".

Yesterday, we received a (personalised) letter (Canada Post) from the City telling us to register.

So much for having improved and simplified the registration process and another waste of money!
It's possible this was due to the postal strike, and notification was mailed out (or sitting in an outbox, waiting to get mailed out) just before the postal workers struck on November 15th.

I'd take anything that comes in the mail over the next few weeks as being from an unknown date. I still haven't received my Driver's License, which was also renewed in early November.
 
It's possible this was due to the postal strike, and notification was mailed out (or sitting in an outbox, waiting to get mailed out) just before the postal workers struck on November 15th.

I'd take anything that comes in the mail over the next few weeks as being from an unknown date. I still haven't received my Driver's License, which was also renewed in early November.
Well, I registered online on November 4th, the strike started on November 15 and their letter is dated November 22. It should surely have been possible to exclude those already registered right up to the date of the letter AND the letter should (but does not) say "If you have already registered your property for 2024 please ignore this letter". I too am all in favour of giving people the benefit of the doubt but I do not have much doubt that we are dealing with incompetence here.
 
Chris Moise has just put out his January Newsletter. He reports on encampments:

"One persistent file I know I will continue spending time on in 2025 is encampments, which was in the news once again at the end of last year. On December 5, Premier Doug Ford sent a letter responding to a number of mayors across Ontario indicating his government’s intent to provide municipalities the ability to regulate and prohibit encampments. One week later, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing introduced Bill 242, “Safer Municipalities Act, 2024.” Speaking of this new bill and its potential infringement on constitutional rights previously articulated by the courts regarding encampments, Premier Ford said he would, if necessary, invoke the notwithstanding clause to allow violations the Charter of Rights and Freedoms towards this goal.

This request from these mayors – which does not include Mayor Olivia Chow or the City of Toronto–follows a 2023 Superior Court of Justice decision in Waterloo. This decision declared that removing individuals from an encampment without being able to provide an accessible shelter bed is a violation of section 7 – Life, liberty and security of person – of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Whether one agrees with this decision or not, it has shaped the municipal response across Ontario to encampments, including Toronto’s.

Following a report from the Ombudsman on the City’s previous actions related to the clearing of encampments, the Interdivisional Protocol for Encampments in Toronto was created, guiding the City’s response to encampments since.
Bill 242 does two things. First, it gives police the authority to arrest and charge someone who is consuming illegal substances on public property with a potential $10,000 fine and/or six months of jail time. Secondly, it tells courts to consider additional factors when considering a trespassing offense that could result in up to a $10,000 fine if convicted.

On its face, this may seem to be a reasonable way for municipalities to deal with encampments. I’m unfortunately here to tell you that it’s not.

Encampments are one of the most complex issues facing the city. The negative impact encampments have had in spaces like Allan Gardens, Moss Park and St. James Park is undeniable. Those impacts include public safety concerns, unreasonable noise, drug dealing and much more. I do not accept that a tent is a suitable alternative for a shelter bed, and should not be a stopgap measure until proper housing can be secured. That is why I continue to work with City staff and my council colleagues to expand accessible shelter options and housing opportunities.

Financial penalties and incarceration will not solve the core issue that is driving encampments: a lack of deeply affordable housing. It doesn’t make sense to fine someone who is living in a tent in a park $10,000; they aren’t going to have the money to pay it in the first place, and it’s going to make it much more difficult to stabilize and house that individual if collection agencies are holding several thousand dollars over their heads when they are trying to rebuild their life. Bill 242 is not solving the root causes that create encampments, it’s only going to help perpetuate it.

Jail time for public drug use is equally asinine. Let’s put aside the costs to policing, court services–including paying a prosecutor and a public defender–and let’s just focus on the costs of incarceration. It costs over $300 a day to keep your average person in jail in Canada. It would likely be cheaper for the province to send an individual for six months to a hotel in downtown Toronto with $20,000 in their pocket (or $10,000 if you still want to fine them) than to put them in a jail cell for the same period.

Beyond the province’s response, I need to call out all the mayors and councilors in Ontario who are supporting these measures. You don’t need Bill 242; you just need to do the work.
Toronto Centre was once home to one of the largest encampments in the country at Allan Gardens. Through hard work and perseverance at that park, the City was able to permanently house 98 people and connect 433 individuals to indoor shelter accommodation, allowing the City to remove the encampment. The City did this without needing police intervention and without violating any fundamental rights and freedoms. Importantly, this City did this work within the guidelines provided by the Superior Court of Justice.

Instead of seeking provincial assistance to allow violations to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to “solve” encampments, municipalities should follow the Waterloo decision and create more accessible shelter spaces. Better yet, create housing targeted to your homeless populations so your residents can stay in their communities and support centres, rather than punishing them and pushing them out to neighbouring municipalities, including Toronto. This is the direction the Ontario Big City Mayors caucus recommended the province instead direct its energy toward, and is supported by myself and over 75 mayors and councillors across Ontario.

Creating new housing and shelter spaces is not a simple matter. It takes effort, a lot money and a thick skin to deal with the NIMBYism that often accompanies the opening of such facilities. Premier Ford has promised additional funding to create capacity in shelter systems and additional supports for those living with addiction, which are absolutely necessary. The future Homelessness and Addiction Recovery Treatment (HART) Hub planned for the downtown is welcome after over a decade of provincial neglect.

But living in a tent in a park is not a moral failure, it’s a societal one. And it should be on all levels of government to address head on, rather than seeking to toss the problem in a jail cell.
2025 is going to be a very memorable year, with regime change in the United States, a likely provincial election, and a federal election. It will mean a lot of uncertainty for Toronto. I’m not going anywhere, so like me or hate me, I look forward to hearing from you about how we can make life better for everyone here in Toronto Centre
.
 
@DSCToronto TY for sharing the Councillor's thoughts.

By and large I agree with them.

I would differ somewhat in that I think the focus needs to be on permanent affordable housing over much more expensive to operate shelter beds.

I also think there is a need to address the mental healthcare and severe addiction side of things more clearly, and understanding that this may mean, as a last resort. compulsory treatment in residential care.

Its never something to be taken lightly or done frivolously; but at the same time, when people are clearly unable to function in society, to see properly to their own welfare and/or are causing harm to others; its an option that must be given increasing weight.

****

On that last point, I note that the Governor of the State of New York is about to make a push for new/amended legislation for compulsory care. A woman, a Democrat, in a liberal-leaning state.

I note that to say I think we've gone over the tipping point of society accepting the right to refuse treatment, when someone is evidently a threat/burden to themselves and the community.
 
I think all of this needs to be funded at the provincial level - the cities opting for the easy solution of just eviction I'm sure are likely to encourage (potentially even pay) to transport those impacted to jurisdictions that are doing more ... not sure how that's sustainable.
 
Of course, if things were done properly, the cost of the Traffic Agents would be removed from the Police budget since the City has to hire them (and it's a great idea) because the police refuse to enforce traffic rules.

Not surprised to see Bradford is whining again, he really has become a rather annoying complainer' - too bad as he did seem quite sensible when he first ran for office.

From CP24: https://www.cp24.com/politics/toron...t-will-include-money-for-more-traffic-agents/

Mayor Olivia Chow is vowing to bolster the compliment of traffic agents in the city to 100 this year in order to help ease gridlock at some of the city’s busiest intersections.

“These traffic agents will be moving traffic, getting Toronto moving, giving us time back with our families and loved ones,” Chow said at a downtown press conference. “They even keep us safe as they clear the roads for emergency crews.”

The city deployed 14 traffic agents back in 2023, adding more later that year to help ease major congestion that was occurring along King Street.


Back in February the city said there were 27 traffic agents on the job and that they planned to bring that number up to 40 by March. The city also released data showing that the agents had helped slash streetcar travel times along King Street by quickly dealing with situations where vehicles blocked intersections and other problems.

Director of Transportation Services Barabara Gray said Thursday that there are 48 agents in training now who will hopefully be deployed to city streets in the spring. She said there is also a “constant hiring process” to add additional traffic agents.

Adding the extra agents will costs about $3 million, Chow said, with the figure expected to be reflected in the proposed city budget which will be unveiled Monday.

However speaking with CTV News Toronto, Coun. Brad Bradford called the move a “Band-Aid solution.”


He said there’s still a lack of coordination for construction projects in Toronto and road occupancy permits are issued for far too long.

“Until the mayor wraps her arms around those major issues this is just a Band-Aid for a much bigger issue,” Bradford said.

However Gray said the city has found that having physical agents is key part of easing congestion.

“The automation is important, but boots on the ground is critical for dealing with the complex dynamic at an intersection where you’ve got lots of people trying to get through on cars, lots of people crossing, you’ve got transit that we really need to get through because it moves so many people, as well as cyclists,” she said. “So I think the boots on the ground is a great investment.”

She said Toronto police also provide additional resources at key points like the entrance to the Gardiner Expressway.

The traffic agent program was first piloted back in 2016 as a way to keep traffic moving while freeing up fully trained police officers to focus on other duties instead of directing traffic.
 

Back
Top