News   Apr 24, 2024
 961     1 
News   Apr 24, 2024
 1.5K     1 
News   Apr 24, 2024
 620     0 

Road Safety & Vision Zero Plan

It’s Time for Cities to Rethink Right Turns on Red

See link.

Legal right turns on red are practically a given at intersections from rural Oklahoma to urban Boston. But it wasn’t always so.

It wasn’t until the 1970s that allowing drivers to turn right during the red signal phase became common across the country, says Bill Schultheiss, a civil engineer at Toole Design Group who specializes in bike facilities.

Precipitated by the OPEC oil embargo, the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 required states to allow rights on red to receive certain federal funds. Decades later, every state in the U.S. allows rights on red everywhere — other than New York City — except when prohibited by signage.

Letting drivers turn on red can save gas, but there is a trade-off. Though recent studies are lacking, the body of research shows that allowing rights on red compromises safety for people who walk and bike.

Permitting rights on red increases pedestrian crashes by 60 percent and bike crashes by 100 percent, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found in the 1980s.

A 1995 NHTSA report [PDF] found that the number of right-on-red fatalities was relatively small — about 84 a year — but that 44 percent of the victims were pedestrians, and another 10 percent were bicyclists. Over the 11-year study period, the report stated that 924 people were killed in right-on-red crashes. More than 500 of those killed were people walking and biking.

Injury figures were much higher. For instance, in right-on-red crashes in Indiana, Maryland, and Missouri between 1989 and 1992, injuries occurred at 100 times the rate of fatalities.

With U.S. pedestrian fatalities rising year after year, Schultheiss says it’s time to rethink right-on-red as the default in densely populated places where lots of people walk.

“Should there be right turn on red in a central business district where there’s a whole lot of pedestrians?” Schultheiss said. “It doesn’t make a lot of sense.”

Schultheiss has been doing some work on H Street in Washington, a walkable corridor where the city has made major investments, including the DC streetcar. But though traffic is so intense that right turns on red are practically impossible, it’s still technically allowed. As a result, pedestrians must constantly watch for motorists attempting to turn, often while blocking a crosswalk.

Since it challenges 40 years of bad design habits, Schultheiss said prohibiting rights on red is “a paperwork nightmare,” so engineers are “reluctant to do it.”

“It’s just another example where we prioritize mobility over safety,” he said.

Maybe it's time that the City of Toronto go with No Right Turn on Red, like Montreal and New York City. Except on a green or yellow arrow.
 
It’s Time for Cities to Rethink Right Turns on Red

See link.

Maybe it's time that the City of Toronto go with No Right Turn on Red, like Montreal and New York City. Except on a green or yellow arrow.
In a recent YouTube video of KW's LRT, I saw a new workarounds to ban right turns on red.

Kitchener Waterloo is doing the below for their LRT to ban right turns on LRT:

32498231_10155790168993386_3470137024579633152_o.jpg


But it probably is a paperwork nightmare.
 
Not enough space is given to pedestrians.


They do give plenty of space for the automobile, but some still think more should be given them.

Here's Avenue Road, where it went from two lanes in each direction to three lanes.
s0065_fl0045_id0004.jpg

Avenue Roag.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • Avenue Roag.jpeg
    Avenue Roag.jpeg
    155.8 KB · Views: 562
AT&T & Fleet Complete, First Provider of Connected Vehicle Solutions to Support Vision Zero Network in Helping Cities Eliminate Traffic-related Fatalities
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releas...ate-traffic-related-fatalities-683352471.html
TORONTO, May 22, 2018 /CNW/ - AT&T and Fleet Complete will team up as a charter business member of the Vision Zero Network that helps communities eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries through connected vehicle solutions.

With telematics, predictive analytics and near real-time traffic data, AT&T and Fleet Complete will help cities reach their goals of zero traffic deaths and debilitating injuries among drivers, pedestrians, bikers, and transit users.

With population spikes and rising traffic congestion in major U.S. cities, there are over 40,000 road fatalities due to collisions every year, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Vision Zero Network participants are committed to the elimination of traffic incidents and the resulting fatalities through specific driving behavior campaigns.

AT&T and Fleet Complete will provide technological capabilities and performance metrics to drive the initiative through connected vehicle solutions that can help address aggressive driving patterns quickly and efficiently.

The AT&T Fleet Complete comprehensive telematics platform will help enable strategies to mitigate dangerous driving behaviors through the Vision Zero Network for the state, county, and city departments, including First Response teams and Government agencies. The solution combines safety technologies with detailed reporting in near real time on speeding, harsh braking, fast acceleration, cornering and crash detection. Moreover, its enhanced predictive analytics will help identify potential unsafe patterns and risks associated with aggressive driving. The platform also delivers:

In-cab coaching through advanced driver assistance system (ADAS); and
Proactive vehicle maintenance alerts with detailed engine data.
Metropolises like Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago and New York, among many others, have already begun blazing the path for Vision Zero by engaging key city agencies such as Police, Transportation and Public Health, to drive this initiative.
 
In a recent YouTube video of KW's LRT, I saw a new workarounds to ban right turns on red.

Kitchener Waterloo is doing the below for their LRT to ban right turns on LRT:

Toronto already does that where the LRT/Streetcar is at the edge of the road (as opposed to in the middle). All right turns are prohibited along Queens Quay Eastbound next to the LRT ROW.
 
How Fire Departments Stopped Worrying and Embraced Safer Street Design

From link.

If you’ve ever made the case for a traffic calming project in your city, odds are you’ve butted heads with your local fire department.

Fire officials often insist on wide clearance to operate their large vehicles, which can be at odds with the principles of safe street design. When cities want to narrow car lanes or add bike lanes to make streets safer for walking and biking, fire departments often water down or even stop the plans before they can get started. Even though traffic fatalities outnumber fire deaths in the U.S. by more than 10 to 1, fire officials tend to get the final word.

Other times fire safety is just a pretext to avoid implementing street redesigns that elected officials see as a political liability. That’s the story in Baltimore, where the city has delayed work on major bikeways. Residents upset about the reduction in on-street parking complained first, then the city cited clearance for fire trucks as the reason for backing off the project.

Not every city is as change-averse as Baltimore, however. And in some places, the fire departments are active partners in street redesign initiatives.

One of those cities is Portland, where the Fire Department participates in the street design process led by the city’s Bureau of Transportation.

As Portland has built out bike lanes, narrowed car lanes, and added pedestrian safety measures, the fears about slower response times did not materialize, says Fire Chief Mike Myers.

“There has been no reduction in response times by working with urban planners and transportation leaders to build out Portland,” Myers said on a recent webinar hosted by the National Association of City Transportation Officials.

It also helps to have fire response vehicles that fit well on narrower streets conducive to walking and biking. Compared to European cities, American fire departments use bigger vehicles with wider turning radii.

It doesn’t have to be that way, said Jonah Chiarenza and Alex Epstein, analysts at U.S. DOT’s Volpe Center. The fire trucks in use in Europe are more maneuverable without sacrificing the capacity to carry water or the height of their ladders.

So far, few American cities have opted for these smaller fire vehicles, but San Francisco is an exception. The city recently purchased eight smaller “Vision Zero” engines made by Ferrara Fire Apparatus that can execute sharper turns than typical American fire trucks.

Even if cities don’t purchase new trucks, they should still aim to design streets for safe movement, not for the ease of large vehicles, Epstein and Chiarenza said. For instance, intersections can have shorter crossing distances and tighter corners while remaining negotiable for fire trucks, as long as the stop bars are set far enough back to allow trucks to complete turns.

Screen-Shot-2016-03-17-at-2.30.29-PM.png

A smaller European fire truck (top) and an oversized American one (bottom). Photos: FireHouse.com
 
How Fire Departments Stopped Worrying and Embraced Safer Street Design

From link.



Screen-Shot-2016-03-17-at-2.30.29-PM.png

A smaller European fire truck (top) and an oversized American one (bottom). Photos: FireHouse.com

Completely on point w/good urban planning.

Small apparatus allows narrower r.o.w.(s) which allows for less paved over area and more dense communities even while allowing for single-family homes w/yards.

If one did nothing but cut the ROW in a suburban subdivision from 11M to 7M curb to curb and replicated this across 8 streets you get one additional row of homes or 12.5% more density.

A reconfiguration that allowed for lane-way parking, and accordingly cut garage and driveway width from homes, give you your choice (if the garage added to home width of about 25% more density) or if the garage was within the home footprint, some modest amount of new density, but more greenspace/permeable land.

A very important move we are more than 2 decades overdue to make.
 
Completely on point w/good urban planning.

Small apparatus allows narrower r.o.w.(s) which allows for less paved over area and more dense communities even while allowing for single-family homes w/yards.

If one did nothing but cut the ROW in a suburban subdivision from 11M to 7M curb to curb and replicated this across 8 streets you get one additional row of homes or 12.5% more density.

A reconfiguration that allowed for lane-way parking, and accordingly cut garage and driveway width from homes, give you your choice (if the garage added to home width of about 25% more density) or if the garage was within the home footprint, some modest amount of new density, but more greenspace/permeable land.

A very important move we are more than 2 decades overdue to make.

Only a matter of time before everything will be done by drones anyways.

AoD
 
How Fire Departments Stopped Worrying and Embraced Safer Street Design

From link.



Screen-Shot-2016-03-17-at-2.30.29-PM.png

A smaller European fire truck (top) and an oversized American one (bottom). Photos: FireHouse.com

From appearances, the European truck is just a lift and nothing else, which would need to be supported by a pumper, and appears to have minimal equipment storage and crew capacity. The 'North American' style aerial truck includes a high pressure/high volume pump assembly, has more equipment storage and crew space. Also, you would want to compare the lift heights since the mass/stability of the vehicle is part of the equation.

I suppose you could have smaller, single purpose apparatus but then you would need and overall larger fleet (and more halls) to be capable of delivering the same service, and no doubt people would howl at that.

Maybe one or two fire fighter could drive the small truck to the scene and the rest could take Uber.
 
From appearances, the European truck is just a lift and nothing else, which would need to be supported by a pumper, and appears to have minimal equipment storage and crew capacity. The 'North American' style aerial truck includes a high pressure/high volume pump assembly, has more equipment storage and crew space. Also, you would want to compare the lift heights since the mass/stability of the vehicle is part of the equation.

I suppose you could have smaller, single purpose apparatus but then you would need and overall larger fleet (and more halls) to be capable of delivering the same service, and no doubt people would howl at that.

Maybe one or two fire fighter could drive the small truck to the scene and the rest could take Uber.

Then why do so many fire vehicles came to the fires around in Toronto, or others?
 
Toronto already does that where the LRT/Streetcar is at the edge of the road (as opposed to in the middle). All right turns are prohibited along Queens Quay Eastbound next to the LRT ROW.
Do they illuminte / turn off automatically after the LRV passed? Like the ones in KW?
 

Back
Top