trafficexplorerON's latest activity

Let's say for example you show a white bar for Eastbound traffic. Transit vehicles turning left would conflict with pedestrians on the...

I don't think more signs is what we need. Especially at places like King Street, where the signage clutter has already gone off the...

City/TTC just need to submit the request ... and draft language change for the regulation, to the province. It's not like it has to go...

They can use an angled white bar for turn priority.

That would make sense but it's against the law. That's the whole issue. We need the province to legalize angled white bars so the...

That still means that they can't be on for both directions at the same time, and they can't be on concurrently with pedestrian...

You do know that turn priority means that they don't also have to yield to pedestrian is cyclists, either, right? Or opposing streetcars...

(as stated above) A vertical white bar would imply that streetcars have turn priority as well, similarly to a green arrow. The OTM...

There's one thing besides the obvious HTA/OTM issue that complicates this further: Right now, we can't really change any of the green...

Just to be clear, the Transportation association of Canada, which publishes the Canadian MUTCD does support diagonal white bars for...

The white vertical bar as it currently does. This would be easiest to implement, and give credibility to the Metrolinx "T".

What do you think should represent turns?

^ Thought this would be a pertinent use of the Metrolinx (T) roundel:

I recently found this Aussie traffic light channel... Until bar transit signals are accepted, couldn't we just do this in the interim...

Unfortunately, that's still a conflict with the HTA Regulation 626, for pretty much the same reason red arrows are. That law...