Burnt creek
Active Member
I arrived at Eglington at about 8:15 and took the first train that arrived which turned out to be the eastbound. So I took it to Don Mills, then turned back went to .Mt Dennis and back with a stop for a much needed Coffee at Forest Hills.
The positives:
The underground stations look mostly good. I wouldn't say great though
The connection to UP express is very good. Its not a long distance to walk and its very accessible. You are indoors right up until the last door that lands you onto the UPX platform
The access to the Line 6 platform from Eglington is good as well
The speeds and travel times between Mt Dennis and Eglington look acceptable.
The the rides are smooth and the interior of the cars is OK but its obviously a streetcar running underground, therefore limited seating & not roomy. Not that we didn't already know this already.
The negatives:
It was freezing cold even in the deep underground stations like Eglington
Little details. Wayfaring could be better. had to look hard to make sure i was boarding the training going to the right direction. No network map was visible from inside the trains.
The escalators were out of service at Forest Hills and it was a long climb of stairs in some stations
The only outdoor station that i saw (Sunnybrook park) had terrible shelter. No way would I wait in this weather for a streetcar in that kind of shelter
Conclusion:
There are no surprises to me, Line 5 and 6 are just as I envisioned 15 years ago. I always believed that this line (unlike line 6 - FWLRT) would have some value to commuters, the city and the economy. But its a Jekyll and Hyde line, and to reinforce what an earlier contributor said, anything east of Don Mills has no added value to the city and its users and hence I have no intentions of every using that service east of Don Mills. I will drive instead. I like the idea of splitting it. But the great thing with this line is that you can get to the airport in a reasonable time, connect to some GO service and it connects to both sides of Line 1. As I said before, this service is like the Montreal Olympics, it will be remembered as a financial fiasco but will leave a more positive legacy. Its value will be realized in the longer term whereas line 6 has no such value in the long term and (although much less costly), line 6 its is worst usage of public funds because there is no short term economic value enhancement and no prospect for Long term economics value.
The positives:
The underground stations look mostly good. I wouldn't say great though
The connection to UP express is very good. Its not a long distance to walk and its very accessible. You are indoors right up until the last door that lands you onto the UPX platform
The access to the Line 6 platform from Eglington is good as well
The speeds and travel times between Mt Dennis and Eglington look acceptable.
The the rides are smooth and the interior of the cars is OK but its obviously a streetcar running underground, therefore limited seating & not roomy. Not that we didn't already know this already.
The negatives:
It was freezing cold even in the deep underground stations like Eglington
Little details. Wayfaring could be better. had to look hard to make sure i was boarding the training going to the right direction. No network map was visible from inside the trains.
The escalators were out of service at Forest Hills and it was a long climb of stairs in some stations
The only outdoor station that i saw (Sunnybrook park) had terrible shelter. No way would I wait in this weather for a streetcar in that kind of shelter
Conclusion:
There are no surprises to me, Line 5 and 6 are just as I envisioned 15 years ago. I always believed that this line (unlike line 6 - FWLRT) would have some value to commuters, the city and the economy. But its a Jekyll and Hyde line, and to reinforce what an earlier contributor said, anything east of Don Mills has no added value to the city and its users and hence I have no intentions of every using that service east of Don Mills. I will drive instead. I like the idea of splitting it. But the great thing with this line is that you can get to the airport in a reasonable time, connect to some GO service and it connects to both sides of Line 1. As I said before, this service is like the Montreal Olympics, it will be remembered as a financial fiasco but will leave a more positive legacy. Its value will be realized in the longer term whereas line 6 has no such value in the long term and (although much less costly), line 6 its is worst usage of public funds because there is no short term economic value enhancement and no prospect for Long term economics value.
Last edited:




