kEiThZ
Superstar
If Europe could share its intelligence, why hasn't it stepped in when the US cut it off? Again, is it no political will, or that US has leverage over Europe that precludes EU from stepping in?
Who says the Europeans haven't been sharing? One of the guys featured here was a seat mate on my senior Captain's course:
And you can see European and NATO assets doing surveillance runs on flight trackers. There are capabilities nobody else has. Particularly with satellite surveillance.
But also, the Europeans have been forever reticent about simply ignoring American demands and just going all out. This was even true under Biden. No idea why.
PS. Also a good reminder why we need to have our own capabilities on things like airborne early warning and signals intelligence. This was all considered too much warmongering for Canadians years ago. Hope it's obvious why we need our own now.
PPS. Also a good reminder why we need to watch for the balance between capability and sovereignty. In the video you can see the AWACS refuelling. This is something the Saab Globaleye is not capable of. Remember this when the fight starts over what AEW aircraft we should buy.
And that's just the intelligence. There is also the question of air defenses. Patriot is the backbone of the Ukrainian ballistic missile defense right now. F-16s are the backbone of the cruise missile defense. The munitions for those are manufactured by the US. Most of European weapon systems have subcomponents sourced from US, making those weapons systems subject to third party authorization contract clause (i.e. US can veto their use by Ukraine).
The Americans haven't to date really forced that veto. Doing so would really impact defence sales. They do, however, hold off spares and maintenance knowledge, when they want to push the Ukrainians.
Would be nice to see somebody truly independent like the French (only country with an anti-ITAR policy) step up to provide alternatives.
Last edited:




