UrbanToronto loves a good architectural dust-up, and for the last several years the Pug Awards have provided a way to weigh in on the latest crop of winners and losers completed on our skyline in the previous calendar year. Not that all of the nominees in the Pug Awards are tall, but it is size that matters here: nominated buildings must be 50,000 square feet or larger.

Last year UrbanToronto gave you a place where you could cast votes on the nominees that interpolated two more levels of comfort than the three the Pugs allowed to be registered. The Pugs asked whether you love, like or hate a building, while we allowed you to be Switzerland "I'm Neutral", or merely dislike a nominee too. May 2011 is no time for subtleties however (look who's running the city right now), so this year your only chance to register your commitment, cooperation, or contempt is on the Pug site itself, which we encourage you to do, 38 times.

The 38 buildings vying for your approval at the 2011 Pug Awards

This years nominees include 28 residential and 10 - uh - other buildings that range from the faintly sublime to the decidedly ridiculous, and we all know which ones are which: last year UT members anointed the same winner and runner-up, as well as loser and sidekick, as the Pugs' own picks.

You have until the end of May to add your voice to the tumult at the Pugs, but we would love/like/hate to hear your thoughts here too. Which are the best, most mediocre, and worst of this year's crop? Tell us below, or visit the Pug Awards 2011 thread to comment through your UrbanToronto account.