Toronto U of T: Jackman Law Building Expansion | ?m | 3s | U of T | Hariri Pontarini

49856
 
From yesterday:

IMG_8317.jpg
IMG_8319.jpg
IMG_8321.jpg
IMG_8323.jpg
IMG_8325.jpg
IMG_8332.jpg
IMG_8334.jpg
IMG_8336.jpg
IMG_8338.jpg
IMG_8340.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8317.jpg
    IMG_8317.jpg
    357.3 KB · Views: 1,485
  • IMG_8319.jpg
    IMG_8319.jpg
    276.1 KB · Views: 1,481
  • IMG_8321.jpg
    IMG_8321.jpg
    277.3 KB · Views: 1,482
  • IMG_8323.jpg
    IMG_8323.jpg
    639.6 KB · Views: 1,502
  • IMG_8325.jpg
    IMG_8325.jpg
    430.2 KB · Views: 1,464
  • IMG_8332.jpg
    IMG_8332.jpg
    400.8 KB · Views: 1,489
  • IMG_8334.jpg
    IMG_8334.jpg
    437.9 KB · Views: 1,491
  • IMG_8336.jpg
    IMG_8336.jpg
    425.8 KB · Views: 1,492
  • IMG_8338.jpg
    IMG_8338.jpg
    369.2 KB · Views: 1,460
  • IMG_8340.jpg
    IMG_8340.jpg
    435.5 KB · Views: 1,498
This is wonderful! The concave curve of this building should look Sweet. Can't wait for the redesign of my undergrad school's grounds, too.

Would be nice if the quality of design and materials used in general high-rise residential construction were more like an average institutional project around U of T.
 
Drove by the building yesterday and I saw a mason putting up the stone façade. It was being done stone-by-stone old school style rather then using pre-fabricated units. Looks great. I find stone installed in pre-fabricated units just looks fake.
 
Snapped a few whilst walking past today. Tough to know precisely what stage they're at, but I'm somewhat surprised given the renderings that they've left the concrete unfinished (or that it's concrete at all). From many perspectives, at least at this stage, the structure is distinctly modernist and actually doesn't stand out particularly (at least from the east view represented below) from many of the other modernist structures on the campus in the area. I'm interested to see how this comes along as they finish the exterior.

IMG_5625.JPG
IMG_5626.JPG
IMG_5624.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5625.JPG
    IMG_5625.JPG
    95.9 KB · Views: 501
  • IMG_5626.JPG
    IMG_5626.JPG
    60.5 KB · Views: 495
  • IMG_5624.JPG
    IMG_5624.JPG
    53.4 KB · Views: 510
Ohh, super interesting—hadn't seen those and, as such (and because in today's light it really didn't look that way), I hadn't actually appreciated the material was stone and not concrete.

I can't tell for certain because of the lighting conditions in your shots, but the stone should look like this when completed, as per one of Salsa's shots above:

22003850393_96968d879b_h.jpg


42
 
From yesterday, Queen's Park side:

DSC01590.jpg
DSC01591.jpg
DSC01592.jpg
DSC01593.jpg
DSC01602.jpg
DSC01603.jpg
DSC01604.jpg
DSC01607.jpg
DSC01703.jpg
DSC01704.jpg
DSC01802.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • DSC01590.jpg
    DSC01590.jpg
    250.7 KB · Views: 323
  • DSC01591.jpg
    DSC01591.jpg
    290.3 KB · Views: 323
  • DSC01592.jpg
    DSC01592.jpg
    372.1 KB · Views: 354
  • DSC01593.jpg
    DSC01593.jpg
    318.4 KB · Views: 311
  • DSC01602.jpg
    DSC01602.jpg
    513.1 KB · Views: 321
  • DSC01603.jpg
    DSC01603.jpg
    343.6 KB · Views: 308
  • DSC01604.jpg
    DSC01604.jpg
    325.9 KB · Views: 327
  • DSC01607.jpg
    DSC01607.jpg
    293.6 KB · Views: 329
  • DSC01703.jpg
    DSC01703.jpg
    345.1 KB · Views: 309
  • DSC01704.jpg
    DSC01704.jpg
    393.3 KB · Views: 310
  • DSC01802.jpg
    DSC01802.jpg
    280.6 KB · Views: 315

Back
Top