Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread
Grange Park 
Grange Park, Toronto
Developer:

Grange Park | ?m | ?s

Discussion in 'Buildings' started by mjl08, Sep 26, 2008.

  1. mjl08

    mjl08 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    326
    Location:
    Toronto
    With the OCAD building firmly settled in and the AGO Gehry addition nearly done, isn't it time that Grange Park is redeveloped?

    I mean, as far as Toronto parks are concerned, its certainly of high standard, but perhaps not high enough to be neighbouring likely the two most important pieces of architecture this city has seen in over a decade.

    I envision a large fountain with the Grange and Gehry addition in the foreground, better maintained landscaping and perhaps a small band shell.

    Has there been any talk at all about revitalizing the park?
     
    #1

  2. androiduk

    androiduk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,457
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Yonge & Great Gulf (giddyup)
    Great idea mj, the park is definitely a little rough around the edges. I'd like to see a large terraced cafe on the south side of the AGO. It would add some animation to the park especially at night. A grand fountain would fit in nicely, we don't have nearly enough in the city.
     
    #2
  3. jn_12

    jn_12 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,081
    Likes Received:
    1
    I've mentioned this in the AGO thread, and after visits to Paris and Brussels, there are too many possible examples of what we could have. Preferably, I'd love to see our very own version of the Musee Rodin. There's no reason why such a prominent venue as the AGO shouldn't have something that splendid in front of it.
     
    #3
  4. adma

    adma Superstar

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    15,426
    Likes Received:
    373
    I wouldn't go too much beyond a fountain. Whether you like it or not, the front-lawn-of-the-Grange aspect of Grange Park counts as something of a "heritage feature", i.e. you can't add too much extraneous trivia and transformation without compromising it...
     
    #4
  5. jn_12

    jn_12 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,081
    Likes Received:
    1
    How sad if we're stuck with something shabby for centuries to come simply because everything that pre-dated a certain time can't be touched. I'm all for preserving heritage, but as any sort of heritage site this is a glorified front lawn. I think it would be a shame that we use this as an excuse. If this was used as an argument in Europe nothing would ever be touched. Fact is even St James Park in London which is one of the most famous in the world has underwent changes over time, and no one seems to be up in arms today wishing it was reverted to any previous look.

    I doubt the Boulton's would be upset today to see something amazing on what was at one point their lawn.
     
    #5
  6. Hipster Duck

    Hipster Duck Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,558
    Likes Received:
    4
    Grange park isn't the shabbiest downtown Toronto park (hello, Clarence Square?), but like all parks in Toronto, it could stand some sympathetic plantings, dignified paving and more benches.
     
    #6
  7. adma

    adma Superstar

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    15,426
    Likes Received:
    373
    Ah, but people would certainly be up in arms in the event that anyone proposed significant "changes" to St James's Park *today*. (And besides, it's a much larger space, so that "changes" which'd be destructively overbearing in Grange Park could be more readily absorbed at St. James's. But by and large, there *hasn't* been much significant change to St. James's for decades, unless high-rises obtruding on the skyline count.)

    Though the Boultons would be upset at your referring to them as the Boulton's.

    And let me ask--what, pray tell, is so inherently shabby about its being the front lawn to the Grange? If you want "something amazing", let it be temp installations a la Nuit Blanche. Otherwise, get rid of some of that constrictive fencing, maybe remove or relocate some of the parks-department flotsam. But at the very least, retain the front-drive-looping-to-the-portico serenity--keep it simple...
     
    #7
  8. Tewder

    Tewder Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    148
    I would advocate something a little more 'uplifting' for this particular green space, surrounded by the AGO and OCAD as it is. I agree with the idea of a more formalized or stylized space here with public art/statuary/fountains/gardens etc. I'm not against Adma's spin on things but the messy urbanism/weeds-are-heritage default position is a little overdone in this city where we already have numerous examples of this aesthetic for it to be considered endangered. If there is anywhere that could support something a little more formal it is here. No to mention the fact that a fomalized green space with the right kind of programming could attract more visitors as a destination in and of itself, and thereby provide some financial support to the museum and/or school.
     
    #8
  9. AlvinofDiaspar

    AlvinofDiaspar Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    20,606
    Likes Received:
    5,010
    Location:
    Toronto
    Totally agree. In fact, I would suggest any Grange Park Master Plan should look at levelling the Uno Prii apartment building as well as part of the University Settlement Centre (except the park fronting McCaul, which can serve as the southern expansion site for OCAD).

    AoD
     
    #9
  10. Archivist

    Archivist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'd love to see the Gallery Towers gone, it was a Spadina Expressway in reverse (a hard fought battle that was lost). Though not, of course, as deadly in its impact as the expressway would have been. I doubt it could be demolished, but as a second best I would have the city expropriate the land currently belonging to the building but adjoining the park, to make the park bigger. It's never used, and seems so utterly pointless.

    The other buildings, the remnant of St. George the Martyr, the school, the rectory and Aboveground Art Supplies, I would spare.
     
    #10
  11. MetroMan

    MetroMan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6,342
    Likes Received:
    697
    Location:
    Toronto
    I had proposed a revitalization some time ago in the Transformation AGO thread: http://www.urbantoronto.ca/showpost.php?p=157124&postcount=672

    I'll transplant my post here for further consideration and discussion:

     
    #11
  12. mjl08

    mjl08 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    326
    Location:
    Toronto
    Fantastic, Metroman! I'm not too sure about those leafy canopies down the main path, because it could take away the vantage point of the Grange and Gehry addition. I really like the reorganized paths, compared to the baseball diamond pattern we have now.
     
    #12
  13. BobBob

    BobBob Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice proposal, but I would definitely look into demolishing the Prii building, moving the density into the south half of its lot, into more urban buildings, and annexing the north half into Grange Park.
     
    #13
  14. MetroMan

    MetroMan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6,342
    Likes Received:
    697
    Location:
    Toronto
    Demolishing the apartment complex is easier said than done. People live there – there are leases to be honored. You can't just kick people out. The rental code is a very slippery slope.

    Even if the owner wanted to be bought out, he couldn't terminate everybody's lease if he wanted to.

    We can look at Regent park as an example of how people people were made to vacate apartment complexes, but the city would have a very hard time making a case.

    The only way that this could be done would be for the city to buy the property and manage the transition which could take years of having people vacate naturally and not filling the vacated apartments.

    This would best be done by a condo developer with the deep pockets and motivation.
     
    #14
  15. Hydrogen

    Hydrogen post-young

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice idea MetroMan, but you may want to take note of other parks where foot traffic has pounded out its own route from here to there. While your proposal looks nice from above, it positively encourages a walk across that nice green lawn on the ground.
     
    #15

Share This Page