Toronto College Park Revitalization with Barbara Ann Scott Skate Trail | ?m | ?s | City of Toronto | RAW Design

There has got to be a way to construct a park on top of a structure so that the structure can be repaired from underneath when need be, so that the park with all its buildings and vegetation does not need to be scraped off the top of the structure every 40 years when a new membrane is required. Not that I miss what's been removed, and I'm glad we'll have better planting conditions, better landscaping, and better pavilions for the park than we had before, but in 40 years time, here's hoping they don't have to wipe the slate clean again.

42

I couldn't agree more. And no matter how rational and logical @DSC is being in his explanations of why it is is necessary, I nonetheless find it discouraging. Particularly the loss of mature trees every 30-40 years. Same deal with Cloud Gardens.

I get it. I'm just not happy with the reality.
 
First few shots from last week:
2016-10-18 09.10.42.jpg

2016-10-18 09.10.26.jpg

2016-10-18 09.10.51.jpg

And Monday morning:
2016-10-24 09.28.45.jpg

2016-10-24 09.29.09.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 2016-10-18 09.10.42.jpg
    2016-10-18 09.10.42.jpg
    469.2 KB · Views: 1,978
  • 2016-10-18 09.10.26.jpg
    2016-10-18 09.10.26.jpg
    382.8 KB · Views: 1,987
  • 2016-10-18 09.10.51.jpg
    2016-10-18 09.10.51.jpg
    454.9 KB · Views: 1,938
  • 2016-10-24 09.28.45.jpg
    2016-10-24 09.28.45.jpg
    456.8 KB · Views: 1,955
  • 2016-10-24 09.29.09.jpg
    2016-10-24 09.29.09.jpg
    496.5 KB · Views: 1,921
I wonder why so much foam below the crushed stone, as opposed to more soil. There are trees planned for that closest corner in those shots. They must be planning some mounded earth to plant them in since the City now has minimum soil quantities required for each tree…

42
 
I wonder why so much foam below the crushed stone, as opposed to more soil. There are trees planned for that closest corner in those shots. They must be planning some mounded earth to plant them in since the City now has minimum soil quantities required for each tree…

42

The soil would mix with water and be more problematic - clogging the drainage system and constantly providing a moist surface above the water lining tar - getting into cracks with ice forming cracks in the water proofing tar.

This type of foam doesn't hold water, any water that reaches it, just runs by into the drainage system. Added bonus is that with the spacing between the foam blocks, it'll provide some aeration to the crushed rocks and top soil from the bottom. That's good for gardening,....

Also, you have to remember what are they putting on top,... not just a regular park with green-space,..... but a refrigerated ice path,.... if there's drainage issues and only wet soil below without foam, the loading docks and parking spaces below would be supporting a huge block of ice and be constantly cold like morgue,.... hmmm,.. might be a good place to store some wine! Anyways, the foam will provide some insulation to the loading docks and parking level below as well.
 
I'm not talking about the area with the refrigerated skating path. I'm specifically asking about the corner that juts out between the stairs and the lower terrace, where there are going to be trees planted. That foam looks like it's over a foot thick, and I'm surprised that much is required. Those are going to be have to be sizeable mounds of earth covering it.

42
 
Lots of activity and progress since the last update. First batch of photos from Friday afternoon:
DSC_0614 copy.jpg

DSC_0613.jpg

DSC_0619 copy.jpg

DSC_0624 copy.jpg
DSC_0622.jpg

And busy yesterday afternoon pouring concrete into the future pavilion facility:
DSC_0627.jpg

DSC_0654.jpg

DSC_0655.jpg
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0622.jpg
    DSC_0622.jpg
    131.6 KB · Views: 939
  • DSC_0619 copy.jpg
    DSC_0619 copy.jpg
    177.2 KB · Views: 956
  • DSC_0613.jpg
    DSC_0613.jpg
    241.9 KB · Views: 951
  • DSC_0614 copy.jpg
    DSC_0614 copy.jpg
    279.9 KB · Views: 942
  • DSC_0624 copy.jpg
    DSC_0624 copy.jpg
    190.3 KB · Views: 947
  • DSC_0627.jpg
    DSC_0627.jpg
    251.3 KB · Views: 951
  • DSC_0654.jpg
    DSC_0654.jpg
    301.3 KB · Views: 931
  • DSC_0655.jpg
    DSC_0655.jpg
    180.9 KB · Views: 1,017

Back
Top