Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread
200 Russell Hill 
200 Russell Hill Road, Toronto
Developer: Hirsh Development Group

200 Russell Hill | ?m | 5s | Hirsh | Rafael + Bigauskas

Discussion in 'Buildings' started by interchange42, Jan 27, 2017.

  1. interchange42

    interchange42 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    18,810
    Likes Received:
    8,250
    Location:
    by the Humber
    Super luxury condo planned for a property backing on Winston Churchill Park which once had a mansion on it. No docs at the City's site yet, but a rather lavish website at http://200russellhill.com which has the unmitigated gall to quote Frank Gehry on the timelessness that architectural works should seek, yet it looks like this:

    200RHillCloseUp1280.

    Developer Simon Hirsh is a new name in Toronto, but not in Mukoka where he's been a successful luxury vacation home builder.

    The architect of record, apparently, is Rafael + Bigauskas, but they're not mentioned on the website where it's all about designer Lori Morris. Her company, LMD are typically interior designers, but it looks like they have much more of a hand in the overall design here than just that.

    Way more up on the dataBase file.

    42
     
    #1
    ADRM likes this.

  2. Ottawan

    Ottawan Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2014
    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    324
    Location:
    Bloor & Jane
    22 units with all those amenity spaces, two elevators and a concierge desk? These people will be paying more in condo fees than the average apartment's rent.
     
    #2
  3. adHominem

    adHominem Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    923
    Likes Received:
    321
    Location:
    Bloordale
    Like a seven-year-old's idea of what rich people like.
     
    #3
  4. Canadian Chocho

    Canadian Chocho Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2013
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    80
    The windows are shocking.
     
    #4
  5. ADRM

    ADRM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    4,094
    They've already hosted a number of sales-y events, and there's A-frame advertising all over Yorkville.
     
    #5
  6. ProjectEnd

    ProjectEnd Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    6,673
    Likes Received:
    2,358
    The view that I'd imagine the team doesn't want you to see. 'Ultra luxury' spandrel-n-mullion mess...

    [​IMG]
     
    #6
    GeneralGrievance and ADRM like this.
  7. ADRM

    ADRM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    4,094
    Yikes. It's cute/sad when architects (or, granted, the developers giving them their budgetary marching orders) think they're doing a Robert A.M. Stern building and then produce this.
     
    #7
    UrbanFervour likes this.
  8. interchange42

    interchange42 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    18,810
    Likes Received:
    8,250
    Location:
    by the Humber
    That's the west side that faces the park, the south side is pretty much the mirror image. The frenchiness is restricted to the sides seen from Russell Hill Road.

    I'm declaring this Third Empire style, BTW.

    42
     
    #8
    pman, AlbertC, alklay and 1 other person like this.
  9. UrbanFervour

    UrbanFervour Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    146
    The marketing writes itself:


    "200 Russell Hill... where olde-world charm meets new money vulgarity"

    "200 Russell Hill... where Paris meets Woodbridge - in the heart of South Hill"

    "200 Russell Hill... screw taste. You've got cash!"
     
    #9
    pman and adHominem like this.
  10. UrbanFervour

    UrbanFervour Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    146
    Cute when it's out in Vaughan and we don't have to look at it. Sad when it's plunked down in a beautiful old neighbourhood.

    The thing is, traditional architecture, when executed properly, can be very charming. But it requires restraint and at least some faithfulness to the details, proportions, materials and established rules of the style it's imitating. Robert Stern is obviously the best at doing this kind of work presently.

    This... THING... is a grotesque bastardization - made for rich suburban Philistines with zero cultural refinement.


    As Dolly Parton said "It takes a lot of money to look this cheap"
     
    #10
  11. pman

    pman Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    384
    I thought the City had a design review panel now. Am I wrong, or is it just that while we have one, it's totally ineffectual?
     
    #11
  12. ADRM

    ADRM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    4,094
    Participation in that process is voluntary.
     
    #12
  13. yin_yang

    yin_yang Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    3
    I love it. Reminds me of 1 Post Road. And it fits in with the neighbourhood. It's edgy.
     
    #13
  14. junctionist

    junctionist Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Messages:
    7,789
    Likes Received:
    787
    It looks like they started off in the late 19th century and then progressed to the 1920s by channelling Walter Gropius.
     
    #14
  15. interchange42

    interchange42 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    18,810
    Likes Received:
    8,250
    Location:
    by the Humber
    …and, as I mentioned above, there are no docs on the City's site yet for this development. Not sure if they need a zoning amendment or not, but at the least, the building is not up for Site Plan Approval yet. That means that it isn't yet going through the process that could lead to a DRP review.

    There are a few things you need to know about the DRP.

    1) There is no legislation that permits the City (through the DRP or any other method) to force a developer to change the style of a building.

    2) Because of that, the DRP doesn't really focus on style. Instead, they focus on areas where they can nudge buildings into compliance with guidelines and standards, the things which are more quantifiable, classifiable, measurable aspects of building designs. Comments on style from DRP members are more like asides.

    3) Developers do have to instruct their architects to make the changes the DRP recommend. In fact, sometimes different DRP members ask for different things, so sometimes they are faced with a choice. What developers have to consider though is how those requests might impact their chances otherwise in the planning process. Ultimately there are some value judgements made by City Councillors whether or not a plan that asks for amendments is worthy of having the amendments granted. When it's a question of height, more than anything else, the Councillor needs to worry about how the OMB will side in the event of an appeal, but other questionable aspects of designs, like where a building might poke through an angular plane that it would normally expected to be under, is somewhere that a Councillor would have some sway to say either "ehhh, no big deal" or "not a chance", depending on how the Councillor is feeling about the application overall. All that is to say that a developer should listen to the DRP's requests if they need to win over the local Councillor.

    4) Finally, not every building gets a DRP review: there's simply not the capacity in the system yet to tackle them all. If you go to the City's DRP webpage, you'll see, however, that there are currently looking for more panel members so that more DRP reviews can go ahead. I believe they want to double the number of members and meetings.

    I hope that helps.

    42
     
    #15
    ProjectEnd and ADRM like this.

Share This Page