News   Apr 18, 2024
 694     0 
News   Apr 18, 2024
 6.2K     2 
News   Apr 18, 2024
 2.4K     4 

Roads: Gardiner Expressway

Here are shots of the work on the Gardiner in the Fort York area from yesterday afternoon:

DSC08100.jpg
DSC08101.jpg
DSC08103.jpg
DSC08106.jpg
DSC08107.jpg
DSC08111.jpg
DSC08112.jpg
DSC08117.jpg
DSC08119.jpg
DSC08113.jpg
DSC08115.jpg
DSC08124.jpg
DSC08127.jpg
DSC08129.jpg
DSC08132.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • DSC08100.jpg
    DSC08100.jpg
    211.4 KB · Views: 1,032
  • DSC08101.jpg
    DSC08101.jpg
    553.7 KB · Views: 1,036
  • DSC08103.jpg
    DSC08103.jpg
    269.4 KB · Views: 1,025
  • DSC08106.jpg
    DSC08106.jpg
    207.3 KB · Views: 1,024
  • DSC08107.jpg
    DSC08107.jpg
    232.7 KB · Views: 1,031
  • DSC08111.jpg
    DSC08111.jpg
    190.3 KB · Views: 992
  • DSC08112.jpg
    DSC08112.jpg
    287 KB · Views: 1,019
  • DSC08113.jpg
    DSC08113.jpg
    244.5 KB · Views: 999
  • DSC08115.jpg
    DSC08115.jpg
    196.6 KB · Views: 994
  • DSC08117.jpg
    DSC08117.jpg
    282.7 KB · Views: 996
  • DSC08119.jpg
    DSC08119.jpg
    280.2 KB · Views: 988
  • DSC08124.jpg
    DSC08124.jpg
    256.6 KB · Views: 984
  • DSC08127.jpg
    DSC08127.jpg
    330.9 KB · Views: 970
  • DSC08129.jpg
    DSC08129.jpg
    342 KB · Views: 1,001
  • DSC08132.jpg
    DSC08132.jpg
    292.5 KB · Views: 988
Come comment on a thing that city council has already decided is happening no matter the cost.


Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.20.12 AM.png

Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.20.17 AM.png


Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.19.45 AM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.19.45 AM.png
    Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.19.45 AM.png
    37.3 KB · Views: 845
  • Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.20.12 AM.png
    Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.20.12 AM.png
    14.2 KB · Views: 853
  • Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.20.17 AM.png
    Screen shot 2016-01-06 at 2.20.17 AM.png
    49.3 KB · Views: 846
Still think this whole endeavor is half-assed and lacks vision. Tear down the Gardiner. If you still need a downtown highway connection between the DVP and western portion of the Gardiner, run a toll highway underground, preferably under Richmond from the DVP to a Front Street extension for the westbound portion, and under a Front Street extension and Adelaide to the DVP for the eastbound portion. Open up the waterfront. Also, start building on top of the train tracks. We need seamless city to the lake, undivided by highways and tracks, like any great city. This would open up land for development and add to the tax base. Get it right or don't bother.
 
Still think this whole endeavor is half-assed and lacks vision. Tear down the Gardiner. If you still need a downtown highway connection between the DVP and western portion of the Gardiner, run a toll highway underground, preferably under Richmond from the DVP to a Front Street extension for the westbound portion, and under a Front Street extension and Adelaide to the DVP for the eastbound portion. Open up the waterfront. Also, start building on top of the train tracks. We need seamless city to the lake, undivided by highways and tracks, like any great city. This would open up land for development and add to the tax base. Get it right or don't bother.
I don't understand why the Gardiner isn't buried under the harbour. The capacity could even be increased, if need be. The existing Gardiner could then be dismantled after the tunnel(s) is complete.
 
I don't understand why the Gardiner isn't buried under the harbour. The capacity could even be increased, if need be. The existing Gardiner could then be dismantled after the tunnel(s) is complete.

See Seattle. See Boston.

You think the Spadina Subway Extension is bad? The cost overruns on a Gardiner tunnel near the harbourfront would likely be astronomical.
 
I don't understand why the Gardiner isn't buried under the harbour. The capacity could even be increased, if need be. The existing Gardiner could then be dismantled after the tunnel(s) is complete.

I proposed something a while ago where basically the Gardiner would be put into a tunnel along the existing waterfront shoreline. A new shore wall would be constructed 40-50 out from the current shoreline, drained, dredged, and the tunnel constructed using cut and cover. The fill could come from the DRL, which should supply most of what's needed.

At the end of it, the Gardiner would be underground from the Exhibition to the DVP, significant chunks of land from the current Gardiner unlocked, and Toronto would have a great new waterfront park stretching all the way from Bathurst to the DVP. The land recovery revenue plus tolling could cover the construction costs.
 
I don't understand why the Gardiner isn't buried under the harbour. The capacity could even be increased, if need be. The existing Gardiner could then be dismantled after the tunnel(s) is complete.
Clearly you also do not understand economics, budgets or politics!
 
Okay, back to reality.

I feel very strongly that tunneling for a subway line like DRL should be coupled with and paid for by an underground toll highway like Paris's A86, perhaps one that runs south from Eglinton West station atop an Allen Expressway tunneled underground. Charge sky-high tolls a la Highway 407 and you have your capitol construction costs covered for the DRL tunneling. Do I think something like this could happen? No. We can't think outside the box and people expect us to build $10 billion subways without funding.

So your idea of paying for the DRL is to build an underground highway and have the tolls pay for the subway? One little problem: now you also have to pay for the highway that you just built. And how many years do we have to waste waiting for the highway to be built first in order to set up the tolls? How about you go read the Metrolinx revenue tool reports to see how infrastructure funding should be done.

Back to reality please.
 
And here's a preview of the "world class" public space that the mayor thinks can be achieved.

CZHIgtKWIAAokDx.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CZHIgtKWIAAokDx.jpg
    CZHIgtKWIAAokDx.jpg
    67.5 KB · Views: 629

Back
Top