News   Apr 23, 2024
 290     0 
News   Apr 22, 2024
 1K     0 
News   Apr 22, 2024
 305     0 

General cycling issues (Is Toronto bike friendly?)

I hope the city finds a temp place for the canoe/kayak rental business.
Business is still open, and miffed like everyone else. I'm told that essentially, "the bosses" got notification two days before the closure. They have now erected signs adorning the
"You Shall Not Pass"
fence with arrows and many notices both to the east and west of the obstruction. Almost all passage is to the west, and the path is now so beaten in that it will remain the path of choice even when the road is opened again. (It has always been there as a lesser alternate for those looking to avoid the road and inconsiderate drivers, the difference now is where and how it meets Old Mill Road, through a planted bed on the west of the obstruction, the south of Old Mill Road next to the trunk sewer pump house)

Take a bow, Parks Toronto, for being stupid asshats yet again. If nothing else, you're consistent in how you treat cyclists and pedestrians alike.

Silly us, thinking parks are for people...they're for cars!
 
Last edited:
The city just got a little bit friendlier.

I took the Shuter bike lane this morning for the first time in months (usually I am in the Richmond/Adelaide cycle tracks). The bike lane used to stop short a block or two before Yonge, resulting in a squeeze. There are now clearly painted cycle lane markings up to Yonge, as well as a left turn lane. The setup seems to work better for bikes as well as cars going straight into the Eaton Centre parkade, or turning left to go south on Yonge.

This change may be small potatoes but it still made me happy to see it.

Shuter is being repaved from Sherbourne to Church. Not only is the pavement smooth, but the bike lane is being realigned. The paint isn't fully complete but it does seem to be an improvement over what I remember. Of course, the lane will really become useful to east siders once it's stretched to River, and links up with the Dundas St bridge...lots of Leslieville/Riverdale cyclists use this route to get into the central city.
 
Shuter is being repaved from Sherbourne to Church. Not only is the pavement smooth, but the bike lane is being realigned. The paint isn't fully complete but it does seem to be an improvement over what I remember. Of course, the lane will really become useful to east siders once it's stretched to River, and links up with the Dundas St bridge...lots of Leslieville/Riverdale cyclists use this route to get into the central city.

Sherbourne to River on Shuter is unrideable and almost undriveable given the current state of the pavement. It's become more obvious now that River is finally repaved.
 
Financial Times (London, UK, one of the world's authoritative business news sources) features:

Smug cyclists are the key to a fume-free city
[...]
Yet they are the future — or better be — for they are fume-free. (At some stage, London will choose between fumes and cyclists.) It’s time to make peace. Many motorists paint cyclists as innately paranoid. In return, cyclists may feel less paranoid if motorists stopped knocking them off their bikes. If I had it my way, London would be a city for cyclists first and last. Every café would be half-café, half-bike repair shop. Buses can stay, but no private cars and no fumes, just sweet air like a meadow. And harmony. In those circumstances, I might even cycle myself. But we’re not there yet.
[...]
Google the title for subscription free access.
 
Yours in envy:
Copenhagen cycle jams tackled with electronic information panels
Danish capital last year saw more bicycles enter city than cars, with almost half of residents cycling to work or school

Jon Henley European affairs correspondent
@jonhenley Wednesday 31 May 2017 18.06 BST

Copenhagen now has so many cyclists that the city is installing electronic information panels along its bike lanes to help prevent two-wheeled traffic jams.

In what city hall has called a world first, an initial five screens will be fitted at strategic points on the Danish capital’s 390km (240-mile) network of protected bike lanes, the state broadcaster Danmarks Radio reported.

“There’s a need for improved accessibility for the growing number of cyclists who unfortunately in many places are now having to fight for space on the bike lane,” said Morten Kabell, head of the city’s technology and environment department.

“We’re hoping with these new information boards to give cyclists the opportunity to choose the least congested route through the city.”

Copenhagen’s residents cycled a total of 1.4m km last year, with 41% of people – including 63% of MPs – cycling to and from work or school, and 32% of all city-centre journeys being made by bike.

Last year, the number of bikes entering the city centre exceeded cars for the first time: sensors recorded 265,700 bicycles daily against 252,600 cars – a major increase from the first survey in 1970 that recorded 100,000 bicycles and 340,000 cars.

At the forefront of efforts to make roads more cycle-friendly, Copenhagen has seen bike traffic rise by 68% over the past 20 years. But despite spending more than 1bn Danish krone on cycling infrastructure since 2005, jams are now increasing.

“Cyclists are already experiencing congestion on the city’s most used cycle paths,” city hall said in February, unveiling an eight-year, Dkr 1.1-1.8bn (£130m-£210m) cycle lane priority plan.

Forecasts show daily bike traffic across Copenhagen set to grow by 25% by 2025 and by 36% in the rush hour.

Several Copenhagen bike lanes are already reaching capacity at peak times, with one – across the Queen Louise bridge – reportedly the busiest in the world, carrying up to 40,000 cyclists a day.

“With the number of cyclists in Copenhagen now, we have a congestion problem,” Niels Agerholm, a traffic researcher at Aalborg university, told Danmarks Radio.

“If there is an easier way through, signs like these could get people to change direction.”

The new signs, costing Dkr4.2m, will carry information on roadworks, special events, distance to destinations, queues and slow-moving bike traffic, and suggest alternative routes using different bike lanes.

Other infrastructure changes to speed up city-centre journeys include widening existing lanes, improving signalling at intersections and building more bike-only bridges to add to the 17 already installed.

The city also recently introduced a “green” update to ibikecph, its route planning app. Besides offering cyclists a fast route, a cobblestone-avoiding alternative and another suited to cumbersome cargo bikes transporting small children, it now also suggests a quieter, more restful “green” route.

With a traffic density four times lower than that of the city’s regular bike paths, some 60km of Copenhagen’s integrated bike paths are now classified as “green routes”, with a further 57km planned, city hall said.

Typical users include older cyclists, families with children and people simply not in so much of a hurry. The app has been downloaded on to mobile phones more than 60,000 times and is consulted more than 20,000 times a month.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...formation-panels-to-reduce-cycling-congestion
 

With growing bicycle congestion, Copenhagen will soon face calls to demolish inner-city slums to construct bike highways. The powerful bicycle manufacturer lobby will buy up tram lines to demolish streetcar lines and decomission buses to make more room for bikes. Swaths of the old city will be demolished to make room for zoned bicycle parking. Citizens will choke on air polluted by the fumes of sweaty cyclists. Eventually a Jane Jacobs figure might emerge, leading a group of protestors who proclaim "Cities are for people, not bicycles!" But at that point it will already be too late, with most of Copenhagen having been rebuilt around the bicycle and politicians with their "handle-bar perspective" will not be able to relate to the concerns of drivers.
 
Not to mention all the medical practitioners under-employed and calling for import duties and walls built to keep the cycle-menace at bay. Car suburbs would also be devastated, and parking lots lying idle while fit and athletic shoppers carry their nutritious snacks home.

This is certainly something Trump and Putin need to form an alliance for to stop it before it spreads and ruins (our?) way of life. The Pipelines depend on it!
 
Happy news...

From link:

Parking enforcement officer takes to Twitter — and two wheels — to zap bike lane invaders

Toronto parking enforcement officer Kyle Ashley invited cyclists to alert him to vehicles in bike lanes and is now naming and shaming companies that force cyclists out into traffic.

Kyle Ashley stops chatting mid-sentence, head turning like a pointer to prey. “I’m getting him,” he whispers, sprinting his bicycle at a pickup truck as it invades a bike lane on Adelaide St. W. near Trump Tower.

The driver, surprised and then angry, eyes the $150 ticket, just as another trucker had done in the same spot minutes earlier. The plumbing contractor grumbles. Ashley firmly tells him: “Your vehicle has airbags — mine doesn’t.”

Over the past month, the 29-year-old Toronto parking enforcement officer has shocked and delighted city cyclists by zapping lane invaders with boundless energy while cheerfully documenting his public safety mission on Twitter.

“#BikeTO cyclists spoke. @TorontoPolice listened. I’m yours. Going to be doing ONLY #bikelanes. Everywhere. M-F-Tweeting/Engaging. For you!” he recently tweeted as @TPS_ParkingPal.

Another included a photo of cyclists forced into vehicle traffic to get around a mail delivery truck completely blocking their bike lane. “C’mon @canadaposthelps ...” Ashley publicly scolded the federal Crown corporation.

It is surprising music to the ears of a bike community used to fraught relations with Toronto police. The parking unit previously ignored tweeted pleas from cyclists. When traffic officers did speak they seemed keen to blame cyclists — even one killed by a motorist — in what many saw as evidence of a car-centric view of streets.

kyle-ashley-parking-enforcer.jpg.size.custom.crop.1086x725.jpg

Toronto parking enforcement officer Kyle Ashley cycles through downtown streets on the lookout for vehicles parked illegally in bike lanes. During a two-hour ridealong with the Star, he issued 14 tickets, despite taking breaks to be interviewed and photographed. (jesse winter / Toronto Star) | Order this photo
Ashley’s online fans include Toronto chief planner Jennifer Keesmaat, who called him “a favourite tweeting cyclist cop, who is adamant about making our streets safer,” while broadcaster George Stroumboulopoulos cheered: “You’re fighting for cycle safely and inclusion!”

The sudden fame has surprised Ashley, who is not a cop but rides a white “Toronto police” bike 75 to 100 kilometres a day on downtown streets including the protected — but oft-breached — bike lanes.

“I never wanted the attention,” he told the Star during a two-hour ridealong that saw him write 14 tickets despite taking breaks to be interviewed and photographed. “I simply wanted to help move the Toronto police forward and give myself a sense of purpose at work.”

The lifelong cyclist, raised in the country outside Guelph, lives in a Mimico condo with his fiancée Dean Sela, an Air Canada pilot, and their dog Kijiji, named for the website where they found her. He joined the parking squad three years ago and moved full-time to the bike, customized with a rainbow flag, a year later.

Ashley volunteered for social media training at the police training college. “They said find your voice, find your community and be part of it and I thought ‘What better way than to help bring light to the issue than by jumping into the conversation ...” and bridging the gap between cyclists and the police service.

His bosses agreed. Not only is he a fixture on social media, for the rest of June at least, he is alone among about 300 frontline parking officers working full-time to try to keep bike lanes free of vehicles.

Ashley has also been freed from daily ticket targets — some say quotas — officers are usually expected to issue. Critics say such targets push officers to spots where they can easily write many tickets for vehicles not posing a safety hazard rather than harder-to-catch bike lane invaders forcing cyclists into vehicle traffic.

Brian Moniz, Ashley’s boss, says the officer “has been instrumental in a very short amount of time in engaging, appealing and listening to the concerns of the cycling community via social media.

“This was a community in which we lacked engagement in previously. Kyle’s consistent engagement, determination and dedication to duty has been noticed and appreciated by all levels in our organization.”

Discussions are underway about the “blitz,” which will likely continue and be expanded, he added.

“Kyle’s engagement in this community and their concerns have been noticed, and we will be training more officers in social media and have a much greater presence within the cycling community,” Moniz said.

Back on the road, a Mercedes SUV turning from Queen St. W. onto James St., between Old City Hall and the Eaton Centre, almost slams into Ashley. As the driver angrily throws up his arms, the officer says it happens often.

He doesn’t give cyclists a pass, saying they have to follow the rules too. He gently scolds one for leaning his foot on the curb at an intersection — it makes for a wobbly push-off — and gives others safety pointers.

But it’s the motorists who get his tickets. A large SUV has avoided the bike lane on Richmond St. but is instead fully on the sidewalk beside a construction site. The owner, wearing a fluorescent construction vest, is summoned by a subordinate. “You wrote it already?” he says to Ashley of the ticket. “You guys are f------...”

The driver stresses, like most of the rest of Ashley’s targets, he was only going to be there for a couple of minutes. He does not seem mollified by knowledge that his fine would have been only $50 had he parked in a vehicle lane.

Still, Ashley has no illusions that he is keeping Toronto cyclists safe. “As soon as I issue a wave of tickets and leave the scene, the cars change over,” and re-invade the lane. “It is like swatting flies away.”

Enforcement will only do so much, he says, venturing out of his jurisdictional lane to say Toronto needs improved infrastructure to better protect cyclists. He is no fan of the “sharrows” — “shared lane” markers that aren’t actual bike lanes — that help make Adelaide St. in the financial district a confusing mess for motorists and cyclists.

Ashley also wants corporations to take responsibility for their lane-invading drivers — he has also called out Tim Hortons and FedEx — and says maybe tickets should be more expensive for them than for regular motorists.

One frustration — motorists simply driving away before he can affix the ticket — should soon be solved by a new administrative tribunal system that will let parking officers mail the ticket along with evidence, such as a photo.

Jared Kolb, executive director of Cycle Toronto, agrees with Ashley that enforcement is one part of the solution to a problem that routinely sees pedestrians and cyclists killed by motorists.

Still, Kolb is delighted parking enforcement is starting to prioritize the safety of cyclists over motorists’ convenience.

“When Kyle arrived on the scene it was, for a lot of us, ‘Whoa, whoa, whoa, what is happening here?’” Kolb says during a pitstop Ashley made at the Cycle Toronto office.

“The work Kyle is doing is really important, but of course we do need more bike lanes to catch up to other cities like Montreal, Toronto and New York, much less Europe and Asia, and better quality infrastructure to really protect cyclists.” He looks at the parking enforcement officer and says, “We want to put you out of business.”

Ashley laughs. “I’d love that.”

 
Happy news...
TorStar posted that article a few days back, and reformatted it, reposted it and gave it new legs. It is cathartic.
Enforcement will only do so much, he says, venturing out of his jurisdictional lane to say Toronto needs improved infrastructure to better protect cyclists. He is no fan of the “sharrows” — “shared lane” markers that aren’t actual bike lanes — that help make Adelaide St. in the financial district a confusing mess for motorists and cyclists.

Ashley also wants corporations to take responsibility for their lane-invading drivers — he has also called out Tim Hortons and FedEx — and says maybe tickets should be more expensive for them than for regular motorists.
I'm glad Keesmaat is taking note. This guy is not only doing a great job on the front line, he has some highly honed and first hand experienced observations on how to make things better.

Hopefully his enthusiasm and results will get more like him out there.

He gives me hope...
 
In today's Manchester Guardian:
Ignore the toxic myth about bike lanes and pollution – the facts utterly debunk it
Peter Walker
A series of articles in conservative media are pushing the bizarre argument that separated bike lanes worsen air quality. Here’s why it’s rubbish

Juliet Samuel is a regular columnist for the Telegraph, who opines authoritatively about politics, society and business. And yet last month she wrote something which was very obviously incorrect.

Something needed to be done, Samuel said, about the “epidemic of bike lanes taking over otherwise useable roads all across London”. She continued:

I cycle and drive, but these lanes go far beyond the measures needed to improve safety and instead just make it almost unbearable to get in a car. It takes a minimum of one hour to get out of town, half of which is spent churning out extra exhaust as you sit on clogged roads and roundabouts that were flowing perfectly well until now.

Even if you ignore the idea that London’s roads used to flow “perfectly well” (perhaps all Samuel’s previous London driving and cycling took place at 5am on Sundays), there is a very obvious error here.

It’s the peculiarly tenacious, if easily disproved myth that building separated cycle lanes causes greater traffic congestion, and thus more pollution.

In Samuel’s very minor defence, she is merely repeating what she has probably read elsewhere. The previous month, James Salmon, the Daily Mail’s transport correspondent, wrote a hugely odd story noting that Cambridge and London had among the slowest average traffic speeds in the country.

The paper put this down largely to cycle lanes, despite the fact other places in the list included Wolverhampton and Hereford, neither of which are known for their Dutch-style levels of cycling infrastructure. (As if in unconscious acknowledgment of the article’s essential absurdity, the story was illustrated with a photo of a bike lane in Cambridge, Massachusetts.)

Unbowed, the Mail used a story last month about the College of Paramedics raising concerns about separated bike lanes (a story that, it is worth noting, misquoted the college’s views) in an editorial column:

Segregated cycle lanes have increased congestion and worsened pollution ... Isn’t it time to abandon this cycle ‘superhighway’ experiment and admit that it was a stupid mistake?

There are two elements to unpick this statement: firstly to debunk the myth; and then to try to understand why it is so persistent.

To use London as a good example, there is zero evidence that separated bike lanes have worsened congestion. Quite the contrary. Transport for London statistics show that just two weeks after the capital’s two new cycle “superhighways” were open, both routes were carrying 5% per hour more people than previously, a figure set to rise as more cyclists use them. Having given 30% of the space to bikes, these now comprised 46% of people using the roads.

This makes sense when you realise that the standard traffic engineers’ rule of thumb is that a road that can carry 2,000 cars per hour on average can carry 14,000 bikes.

Yes, there were some delays when the lanes were built. But there are delays when anything new is constructed, and I have yet to hear the Mail argue that we should not replace London’s Victorian sewers or fix potholes because of the risk of traffic congestion.

As for the claim that bike lanes cause more pollution – one also made, amazingly, by Prof Robert Winston, among others – a thorough debunking of the idea by the blogger Mark Treasure showed pollution monitors have detected no changes to smog levels in areas where bike lanes have been built.

If that wasn’t enough, it’s worth pointing out that currently, just 3% of central London roads have segregated cycle lanes. Could this fact be to blame for London’s slow roads and choking smog?

Well, yes. Traffic seems much more likely to be caused by a combination of high levels of roadworks, lane-blocking new construction, and motor traffic levels which are seemingly staying constant after years of steady decline.

Amid this, there are ever greater numbers of minicabs and vans on the roads, many of the latter delivering Amazon-type parcels. In 2000, 11% of motor vehicles in London were so-called light goods vehicles. By 2015 this had risen to 14%.

As for minicabs, TfL licensing information shows that amid the rise of Uber and its ilk, from 2009-10 to 2016-17 the number of what are officially known as private hire vehicles shot up from just over 49,000 to almost 87,500. That’s a lot of vehicles.

Do we think an extra 38,000 or so minicabs touting for business might be more relevant than a few miles of bike lanes? I certainly do.

So why does this myth persist? I’m afraid it probably comes down to – as I have written about before – how cycling and cyclists remain one of the few areas of life in which newspapers and columnists feel able to write sweeping generalisations without worry.

This is a complex and longer-term issue, as are the many reasons why separated cycle lanes and other infrastructure are so vital for a modern city or town. But in the meantime, when someone repeats the bike lane myth, ask them for evidence.

Bike Nation: How Cycling Can Save the World by Peter Walker is out now.

Guardian Cities is dedicating a week to exploring the future of cycling in cities around the world. Explore our coverage here and follow us on Facebook. Will you be taking our challenge to have conversation with a fellow cycle commuter? Tell us about it here or on Twitter or Instagram using #cycleconvo
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jun/16/myth-bike-lanes-congestion-pollution-debunked

Globe and Mail has a good cycling piece today:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/lif...iders-on-the-road-to-fitness/article35307617/
 
They should improve the Toronto Cyclist Handbook as a start, for us to study before the quiz. See link.
I'm just reviewing the TorStar article to see why it rankled me so much. It's like being back in High School, and knowing more about Physics than your Science teacher, and having to answer the way you think they want to hear, rather than scientifically. Because if they were that good, sure as hell they wouldn't be teaching in High School!

Ohh, the ugly memories...

The one that really got me is the "If a tree falls over in the forest, and no-one is there, is there any sound?". lol....best I leave that one...the rote answer is wrong in so many ways...

So the Star quiz: Almost every question is posed from a limited sense of awareness to readers with an equally limited one.
 
One thing that bugs me is how the 1 metre buffer between cyclists and car don't go both ways.

share-the-road-poster-500x253.gif


As a car driver I always try to give the 1 metre clearance from a cyclist, often only to see the same cyclist catch up as I move at the speed of traffic and squeeze up close alongside me further down the road. Shouldn't they instead pass on the left or otherwise stay behind until they can pass on the right with the 1m clearance?
 
Last edited:
One thing that bugs me is how the 1 metre buffer between cyclists and car don't go both ways.
As a car driver I always try to give the 1 metre clearance from a cyclist, often only to see the same cyclist catch up as a move a speed of traffic and squeeze up close alongside me further down the road. Shouldn't they instead pass on the left or otherwise stay behind until they can pass on the right with the 1m clearance?
Technically, they should. I continually get miffed at other cyclists who haven't the freakin' slightest idea why I stop behind some cars at intersections. They ring their stupid little bells, to squeeze past me to sidle up to a driver who is turning right, and the cyclist has just set themselves up to get rearranged. Then they yell at the driver.

But for the one-metre legislation just passed some six months back, the law is a bit of an ass. It needs provisos added to it in the HTA, as on inner-city roads, it's next to unenforceable. I actually got grazed today on College going east towards Bathurst, well within the cycle lane, but for every actual contact, there's many that come within inches. Said driver also failed to indicate a lane change. There were a couple more offences too, but I'' leave it at that.

Many cyclists haven't a clue either, there's a time when you can pass on the inside, but you use common-sense to do it, and make sure you're not in a blind spot. Even motorcyclists know that one, but many cyclists don't.

One truly badly phrased question in the TorStar tut-tut quiz was (gist) "How much of the road can a cyclist use?"And the answer *is* "all of it". That applies to all vehicles *with caveats*, not the least signalling *every* lane-change, not impeding the flow of traffic, and it not being a controlled access hwy. But here's the rub, as much as the HTA manuals state how cyclists should turn left at multi-lane intersections, in many cases, you'd be an idiot to do it that way. Visibility of adjacent movements is stymied for both cyclists and drivers. Go *through* the intersection to the opposite curb, and wait for the lights to change to change your direction of travel, staying in the outside lanes all the time doing this. You may have every right in the world, it doesn't make it safe or sensible. This is where the Dutch and Danes are generations ahead, they plan infrastructure so that it doesn't put cyclists or pedestrians in those kind of situations.

A lot of the HTA has to be re-written.

And btw: As a general rant: Neither motorists or cyclists are observing the new crosswalk regs where *pedestrians* (cyclists should *not* use pedestrian crosswalks, violation of this is rampant) are to reach the opposite lane sidewalk before traffic can proceed. Mind you, very few cyclists stop for pedestrians crossing, let alone streetcar doors opening. But don't get me started on that one...

Edit to Add: I quickly Googled to see what reference would show for cyclists following vehicular rules at multi-lane intersections, and find *even for motor vehicles* the law isn't clear in Ontario:
Q When an intersection has two designated right-turn lanes, can you make a turn from the second lane against a red light, as is permissible from the regular right-turn lane?

Can a driver move from the inside lane to the outside curb lane when completing the turn?

A Ontario Transportation Ministry spokesperson Patricia Tomasi replies:

Section 144(19) of the provincial Highway Traffic Act states that right turns at intersections (and left turns from a one-way street to one-way street) are permissible against a red light where the driver comes to a full stop and proceeds safely without affecting other traffic.

This section does not specifically mention dual right- and left-turn lanes, however, so there is room for interpretation from police and the courts.

The courts always have the final word in determining what legislation means.

For legal interpretation, seek an opinion from your lawyer based on the specific situation.

Eric Lai adds:

This is a grey area of the law.

It might be advisable not to take the risk of being charged, even if the charge is thrown out later.

In any turn at an intersection, the onus is always on the driver making the turn to ensure that it’s done safely and without adversely affecting other traffic or pedestrians.

Section 141 of the act requires that turns be completed in the corresponding lane on the intersecting roadway.

So a turn from a marked right-turn lane (or, if none exists, outermost curb lane) must first be completed in the outside lane before you signal and make a lane change to an inside lane.

Where multiple turn lanes exist, a right turn from a second marked right-turn lane should be completed in the corresponding second outermost lane.

Road service vehicles and long vehicles unable to comply with these limitations because of size are exempted.

But otherwise, motorists who change lanes during the course of a turn are committing an “improper turn” violation.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...area/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=ubuntu

And that is exactly where the Star's Mickey Mouse Muddle of a Quiz gets cyclists into trouble. There's times where the Law is an Ass, but if a cyclist ignores the law as written, and is charged, make damn sure you have an argument to make before the court as to why. Any court doing its job will dismiss the charge, and ask the prosecution to inform the Ministry to correct the offending section. Forcing someone by law to risk life and limb is in itself an offence. A Federal Offence...
 
Last edited:

Back
Top