News   Apr 22, 2024
Ferris + Associates Merges with NAK Design Group, Reshaping the GTA Landscape
 796     0 
News   Apr 22, 2024
UrbanToronto Webinars: Building Sustainably — Industry and Individuals
 267     0 
News   Apr 22, 2024
Sustainability Month: The Important Link Between Heritage & Sustainability
 673     0 

One32 Berkeley (Concert, 10s, P+S/IBI)

The building is as long as it is tall (56.36 m vs. 60.00 m)

The dimensions are 19.90 m (65.3 ft) wide, 56.36 m (184.9 ft) long with 9.00 m (29.5 ft) set-back, 60.00 m (196.9 ft) high.

It's good that the podium is only 4s to blend with the existing street wall and the tower is set-back but it looks abit chunky at the back.
IMO it would look better if the back was also set-back similar 9.00 m.
 
maestro said:
Ever consider reading the captions?
Click to expand...

What captions? I read the topic of this thread, which says 21s. Usually when there are two buildings, there will be two heights, or 2x21s if there were two buildings of the same height.

I didn't know asking valid questions results in a rotten attitude being thrown at you for no reason.
 
khristopher said:
What captions? I read the topic of this thread, which says 21s. Usually when there are two buildings, there will be two heights, or 2x21s if there were two buildings of the same height.

I didn't know asking valid questions results in a rotten attitude being thrown at you for no reason.
Click to expand...

haha
 
khristopher said:
Is this two different buildings? One looks different than the other.
Click to expand...

I think its one 21s building, the City Staff Report shows the 'original proposal' with the large slab building, compared with the 'redesigned proposal' where a point tower is sited at the back of the property while a 4s podium fronts the street :)
 
What captions? I read the topic of this thread, which says 21s. Usually when there are two buildings, there will be two heights, or 2x21s if there were two buildings of the same height.
Click to expand...

The captions in the PDF silly.


People are so snarky on the Internet. What's up with that?
Click to expand...


Or overly sensitive. What's up with that?
 
Solaris said:
I think its one 21s building, the City Staff Report shows the 'original proposal' with the large slab building, compared with the 'redesigned proposal' where a point tower is sited at the back of the property while a 4s podium fronts the street :)
Click to expand...

How confusing. Thanks...

I actually like the slab design more though haha.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top