News   Apr 19, 2024
 735     0 
News   Apr 19, 2024
 642     2 
News   Apr 19, 2024
 1K     3 

Queen's University News

rdaner

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
4,536
Reaction score
16,737
I think this is relevant for this site because it gives a glimpse of what may be in store for Ryerson and UofT as they embark on new performance and athletic facilities over the coming year. As well, Ontario as a whole is in the midst of a remarkable exercise of placing univesity facilities in traditional downtowns as seen in Brantford, K-W, Cambridge, Burlington (maybe), Toronto waterfront, Stratford and Oshawa. This will have tremendous longterm consequences on the vitality of those areas in the future.

BTW, Lisa Rochon has an interesting site at www.lisarochon.com


CITYSPACE: ARCHITECTURE: THE SHINY NEW WORLD OF UNIVERSITY CAMPUS DESIGN

Higher education, with yoga

LISA ROCHON

lrochon@globeandmail.com

E-mail Lisa Rochon | Read Bio | Latest Columns
September 6, 2008

The beer-swigging and all-night games of caps will never die. Maybe it's harder to flunk out of university these days. But whether they're bleary- or bright-eyed, the truth of the matter is that university and college students in Canada and the United States represent a powerful class of taste arbiters. And once they unpack at university, they're a captive audience for at least four years.

It's no longer enough just to keep students on campus. Now, university planners are strategizing about ways to offer big-city pleasures wrapped up in welcoming, occasionally daring architecture. Worried that your young Ashley or Jacob might be bored away from home? Sorry to disappoint you. Across the continent, universities are spending billions to impress students with their state-of-the-art science laboratories, plush new residences and, high up on the list, out-of-classroom experience.

"Out-of-classroom experience" is the latest catchphrase from the mouths of university architects and administrators, and a key locus of competition between institutions these days. At Queen's University in Kingston, Ont., the hotshot Norwegian architecture firm Snohetta, catapulted to international fame for its stunning, competition-winning designs of the Alexandria Library in Egypt and the Oslo Opera House in Norway, has been hired to design a performing-arts centre on a spectacular site on the shore of Lake Ontario within a stone's throw of the university campus. A 600-seat concert hall is planned along with facilities for Queen's performing-arts departments.

It's too early to see design renderings by Snohetta and the Ottawa firm EMA Architects, but newly appointed Queen's principal Tom Williams says the goal is to make the $50-million centre one of the best acoustical facilities in eastern Canada. A gift of $14-million from philanthropists Alfred and Isabel Bader allowing the purchase of the waterfront site has kick-started the building campaign. If Snohetta is given the creative licence to align the design with the Kingston waterfront the way the firm has done, for instance, along a fjord in Oslo, a powerful cultural generator can be expected. Whether or not the centre can be built to the exacting standards of Snohetta with construction competently managed is still up in the air, but Williams's ambition is impressive: "We're trying to position the centre as part of a cultural tourism mecca, given the location of Kingston. We could within a 2½ hour drive draw on some 15 million people if you include Ithaca, Syracuse and communities in upper New York State."

'I don't want to live with the memory of this all my life'
The folks across the border in Ithaca, however, are already well served by the $1.5-billion (U.S.) worth of building under way at Cornell University, including a newly completed life-sciences building - very white, very modern - by American architect Richard Meier. Rem Koolhaas's box-connector addition to Cornell's College of Architecture, Art and Planning is an uninspired gesture, no matter how the concept is spun by the marketers at the Dutch superstar's Office for Metropolitan Architecture. It is the third attempt to expand the college's spaces and, as it has yet to receive a building permit, perhaps it is also doomed to fail.

Cornell, though, can be lauded for its far-reaching master plan recently completed by Toronto's Urban Strategies, an attempt to look seriously at the big picture in a way that hasn't been undertaken since the 1930s. New buildings are being seriously interpreted as part of a larger landscape, and people-gathering atriums such as the one at Duffield Hall have been included of late. Bicycle paths and delightful gardens with teak furniture have been added, and the concept of how to get a good cup of coffee has been given serious consideration. To please its demanding urbanite students weaned from the breast on Starbucks, coffee carts may soon start appearing in the vast, bucolic courtyards at Cornell.

If you build, they will come - or so the current planning dictate goes. At Queen's, an athletic and student facility extending over two Kingston blocks is being constructed for $230-million, just shy of what was spent on the renovation of the Royal Ontario Museum or the Art Gallery of Ontario. The Queen's Centre has suffered serious cost overruns, but the foundations are poured and the first phase is expected to open late next year. At that point, Queen's will join the ranks of American universities, where giant athletic-student centres are now commonplace.

In fact, the Queen's Centre is similar in its breadth of programming to the Zesiger Sports and Fitness Center, built about five years ago at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, Mass., for approximately the same amount of money. "One of the things that we've seen over time is that students want a variety of social options," says David Dymecki, of the Boston-based Sasaki Associates, which designed both the MIT centre and the Queen's Centre working in collaboration with B + H Architects of Toronto and Shoalts and Zaback of Kingston. "They'd like a place to hang out, to study, to eat, to meet their friends, to work out. Ten or 15 years ago, you might have only seen only one-third of the student population thinking about working out, about wellness. Now about three-quarters of the students say they want to work out and socialize."

To that end, the Queen's Centre will house a new aquatic centre, a gymnasium and a 1,700-seat varsity centre that can host convocation ceremonies, as well as dozens of dance, fitness and yoga studios. There will be volleyball, basketball and squash courts, as well as a food court, space for clubs, meeting rooms and a new home for the university's school of kinesiology emphasizing physical education and, that other favourite catchword of the decade: wellness.

The population of Queen's hovers around 18,000 but, like the majority of those attending colleges and universities, the students are being treated to a feast of architecture filled with as much natural light as urban amenities. Compared to the grand but somewhat stolid stone architecture of 100 years ago, the Queen's student centre emphasizes seamless connections to the street and is designed to achieve LEED recognition for its sustainability. Though massive (its footprint spreads over about 700,000 square feet), it rises only three storeys in keeping with the rest of the low-lying campus; the scale is broken down into five collegiate-type buildings.

What does all of this mean? That newly graduated high-school students are being exposed to the most delectable aspects of cities. That they are being served remarkable amenities as imagined by an impressive roster of architects. And that, if they open their eyes to the change happening at their historic campuses, perhaps today's students will eventually become tougher, more demanding clients for architecture in the future. Or, maybe they'll simply be extra-critical of the meals when they move back home.
 
If it's nice, that performing-arts centre will be the first nice thing built on Kingston's waterfront in 100 years.

Kingston has done an excellent job of almost completely blocking off its downtown waterfront with awful hotels and condos. And that approach to waterfront development continues with some recently added, precast monsters at the foot of Earl St.

Kingston has so much historic potential, but it's such a dump. Like most mid-sized towns in Ontario.
 
A dump? Kingston is one of the nicest small towns in Ontario, and there are some very nice stretches of waterfront parkland very close to the downtown area and the campus.
 
There are so many areas of Kingston that are indeed a 'dump' and has seen better days. Its downtown core can be great in spots but move out of there, and the city is in a sad state.
 
All towns have dumpy areas of course, but Kingston has remarkably little urban sprawl outside the downtown area, relatively speaking.
 
Depends on how you define "Kingston"--maybe if you're speaking of the former city; but it's the former Kingston Township where all the dreary banal sprawly stuff lies.

And in any event, it's universal knowledge that Princess Street is a pretty unprepossessing approach to downtown--like, if any of you think Yonge Street is bad (*hah*)...
 
That's a really good point about new urban university campuses, rdaner. I totally agree! I've got really high hopes for all of them, and there's nothing like a university campus to revitalize a downtown core. Still, many universities seem to be clinging to antiquated, student-unfriendly approaches. UOIT's campus-in-a-field comes to mind, as well as Laurier's even worse plans for Milton. I will never understand why UOIT couldn't have been built in downtown Oshawa.
 
get this off the site... it will provide no insight for toronto!

Kingston is dump and those small town minded people can't provide any ideas on how toronto should be.

I have been to kingston and it was a dump, there were no nice parts. the houses were run down, most of the people were sad... fast food resteraunts seemed to be the main industry outside of the university
 
021215_yanovsky_zal_250.jpg

He'd have begged to differ
 
Don't forget the lucrative maximum security prison.
 
get this off the site... it will provide no insight for toronto!

Kingston is dump and those small town minded people can't provide any ideas on how toronto should be.

I have been to kingston and it was a dump, there were no nice parts. the houses were run down, most of the people were sad... fast food resteraunts seemed to be the main industry outside of the university

methinks it doth protest toomuch :rolleyes:
 
That's a really good point about new urban university campuses, rdaner. I totally agree! I've got really high hopes for all of them, and there's nothing like a university campus to revitalize a downtown core. Still, many universities seem to be clinging to antiquated, student-unfriendly approaches. UOIT's campus-in-a-field comes to mind, as well as Laurier's even worse plans for Milton. I will never understand why UOIT couldn't have been built in downtown Oshawa.

Suburban mentality. Suburban results.
 
it's like all of kingston is circa 1860 and they need a few hundred years to catch up.

have you read the diversity stats for kingston....its white town! how can they have any idea of the direction toronto needs
 
it's like all of kingston is circa 1860 and they need a few hundred years to catch up.

have you read the diversity stats for kingston....its white town! how can they have any idea of the direction toronto needs


Hey, white people are smart too!

This Queen's Centre looks amazing. I think that both of Toronto's downtown Universities could benefit from something similar.
 

Back
Top