Urban Toronto - Powered by vBulletin
Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread  I  Real Estate Thread
Aura at College Park
388 Yonge Street, Toronto
Developer: Canderel

Login to
post and
upload photos
Page 479 of 722 FirstFirst ... 379429469477478479480481489529579 ... LastLast
Results 7,171 to 7,185 of 10819

Thread: Aura: Residences of College Park III (Canderel, 78s, G+C)

  1. #7171
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,487

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dt_toronto_geek View Post
    Dec. 8 2012 -



    A lot of construction time has been lost in January & February due to winds and weather. Feb. 23 2013
    you're gonna have one helluva view of Aura! I think Aura's gonna look best at an angle (as seen in your pic) where the upper half will look sleek as hell. The roof slope will be very dramatic.

    also, in cruzin4u's last pic. it might just be one of the best photos I've seen of Aura's lower-half cladding. The balcony glazing helps a lot.
    I still dislike the 'scrabble block' base material. I also wish the Bedbath/Marshals logos were all placed on one level (above the ground floor), rather than them being stacked awkwardly on one another with no other logos next to them (yet).


  2. #7172

    Default

    dt_toronto_geek, It is much better if you copy the img code posted beside the image on photobucket, as the photo is much larger here:

    [IMG.]http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/xx341/scullydog259/Aura_Feb23-13_zpsc80ae3e9.jpg[/IMG.] (ignore the periods in the img code, they are put there so you can actually see the code)




    Last edited by innsertnamehere; 2013-Feb-23 at 21:04.
    check out my future toronto renders, complete with colour coding of the stages of construction!

    http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showthr...ronto-3d-model

  3. #7173
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Downtown Toronto
    Posts
    10,742

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by innsertnamehere View Post
    dt_toronto_geek, It is much better if you copy the img code posted beside the image on photobucket, as the photo is much larger here:
    Yes, I know that thanks - I've been loading images as thumbnails forever here so as not to slow down the loading of a page but if you prefer that, no problem. Some of my posts when I was able to photograph more used to number in the dozens sometimes!
    “Our roads are not here for automobiles. Our roads are here for people to get around.” - Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City - July 10, 2012

    Original photographic images posted on this forum by dt_toronto_geek are not for publication, display or dissemination of any kind except on the Urban Toronto discussion board, altered or otherwise, without expressed written permission from the owner.

  4. #7174
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    2,713

    Default

    from today

  5. #7175

    Default

    ^Clumsy (the setback, not the photo.)
    Canadian architecture I like: http://renderpornstar.com/

  6. #7176

    Default

    The setback has been looking less awkward the higher they get. The first couple floors looked especially weird from the north because of the way the floor plate tapers back, it made it appear like half the tower abruptly stopped.

    What doesn't seem to be improving is the balcony glass. To my eye it's clashing really badly with the curtainwall on the south elevation. It doesn't look so bad on the window wall sections, but I really wish they'd gone with a simple tint to match the dark curtainwall.

  7. #7177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by urbandreamer View Post
    ^Clumsy (the setback, not the photo.)
    The same could be said of your rush to judgement. You are always too eager to sound the most well-informed and knowledgeable that you sacrifice scrutiny for speed.

    Allow me to elucidate:

    The clumsiness, to which I assume you refer, is the way the northern center section seems to step back from the facade in a double-step, awkward way (indicated below). When likely that secondary setback on the left (Which is the protrusion to accommodate the balconies.) will disappear in a few floors, as the balconies end and the curtainwall begins in that spot (Indicated in a close-up of a rendering I did recently. I am sure they will do a better job than my render.)



    You will note that once the balconies on the eastern side of the north face end, the secondary setback vanishes and the curtainwall blends in nicely. Also, the addition of the service elevator hoarding, is adding a dimension of distraction from the smooth transition the curving curtainwall will make with the western half of the North face.

    Certainly this is just speculation on my part at this point, however I will err on the side of caution before I judge the look of a finished project before it is even halfway completed.
    Last edited by Traynor; 2013-Feb-25 at 13:58. Reason: added information

  8. #7178
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,487

  9. #7179

    Default

    Amazing shots steveve! That balcony glass is doing a pretty decent job of covering up all those mullions. The progress on the curved section is also very interesting to watch. Here is a shot from just now captured by the Aura Webcam:

    Images are not to be reprinted, reposted or used for any purposes whatsoever outside of the Urban Toronto forum without my express consent. Contact me via the following:

    Website - Flickr Photostream - Twitter

  10. #7180

    Default

    Great pics steveve. I gotta say that Aura is looking much better with the balcony glass up and the curve becoming more apparent.

  11. Default

    I was not completely sold on the balcony glass when I first saw it, but I must admit, it's looking pretty smart!
    Mistrust those who don't like cats.

  12. Default

    I'm still not convinced from the balcony glass I think its a little to light colored but overall I like the building and still think as the glass goes up it will get better.

    As of now its reached beast mode in height, seems pretty tall. I would guess around 175m.

    I'm guessing 54th floor anyone know?

  13. #7183

    Default

    52nd I think. 48 floors until the first setback, and then 4 more on top of that.

  14. #7184

    Default

    Traynor: Incorrect.

    Clumsy as in the way the basic shape meets the "square." Even I could've come up with a better solution in SketchUp.

    Btw, recently drove by those horrors around SCC. This building is worse.
    Canadian architecture I like: http://renderpornstar.com/

  15. Default

    UD... you make me smile! A for consistency.
    Mistrust those who don't like cats.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •