Urban Toronto - Powered by vBulletin
Project Essentials / dataBase detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread
Union Pearson Express
,
Developer: Metrolinx

Login to
post and
upload photos
Page 136 of 299 FirstFirst ... 3686126134135136137138146186236 ... LastLast
Results 2,026 to 2,040 of 4473

Thread: GO Georgetown South Corridor/ Union Pearson Express (Metrolinx, U/C)

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rdaner View Post
    Doesn't that belong in the "randompicutresofrailwaytrackswithoutexplanati on" thread?


  2. Default

    Looks like you can fit 8 tracks in that corridor.

  3. #2028

    Default

    Though it does get narrower at some points, we can be happy that we don't have to worry too much about physical constraints in that corridor. With a modern signalling system, it can handle pretty much anything we choose to run. That's why I was so baffled by the recent high-speed rail study that said, presumably based only on a chat with some guy at Metrolinx or GO, that the Weston corridor couldn't accommodate high-speed rail.

  4. #2029
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Republic of Suburbia
    Posts
    990

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unimaginative2 View Post
    Though it does get narrower at some points, we can be happy that we don't have to worry too much about physical constraints in that corridor. With a modern signalling system, it can handle pretty much anything we choose to run. That's why I was so baffled by the recent high-speed rail study that said, presumably based only on a chat with some guy at Metrolinx or GO, that the Weston corridor couldn't accommodate high-speed rail.
    Although the corridor is huge south of Lawrence, there is only room for 2 tracks through downtown Brampton. I expect it was more of a capacity issue than a speed issue, although I doubt you could go much over 100mph with the corners on the line.

    Anyhow, I have posted a map and explanation of my preferred track/service layout here, on the fantasy maps thread.

  5. #2030
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Republic of Suburbia
    Posts
    990

    Default

    Strachan Avenue Grade Separation seems to be making good progress. Pictures taken from middle deck of a Barrie Line GO train on Sunday afternoon:




  6. #2031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unimaginative2 View Post
    Though it does get narrower at some points, we can be happy that we don't have to worry too much about physical constraints in that corridor. With a modern signalling system, it can handle pretty much anything we choose to run. That's why I was so baffled by the recent high-speed rail study that said, presumably based only on a chat with some guy at Metrolinx or GO, that the Weston corridor couldn't accommodate high-speed rail.
    Yeah, that HSR study was a crock, there were so many problems with it. It predicted lower ridership than the study they did 20 years ago for gods sake. It was either designed to be shelved or the people who wrote it have never set foot outside North America.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reaperexpress View Post
    Although the corridor is huge south of Lawrence, there is only room for 2 tracks through downtown Brampton. I expect it was more of a capacity issue than a speed issue, although I doubt you could go much over 100mph with the corners on the line.
    Are we sure about that? In the Hurontario-LRT PIC, in the options for downtown Brampton at Brampton GO, there was some room for a future third track on the Kitchener line indicated.

  8. Default

    The Mill Street/Railroad Street grade crossing west of Brampton Station makes me think a third track would be tricky. Possible if you shaved Railroad Street to one way only but Mill Street crossing itself would likely have to close. There's also the issue of the crossing track (from Orangeville to Streetsville?) which may also have to be depressed under the mainline (if retained at all)

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dowlingm View Post
    The Mill Street/Railroad Street grade crossing west of Brampton Station makes me think a third track would be tricky.
    Wasn't there a plan to jack up the Brampton station building and move it ten or twenty metres north? It looks like they could lay a third track on the north side then... I'm not sure there is the room on the south side, what with the bus station and all. Edit: and, looking at the overpasses further east, they seem to be ready for widening to the north. You might have to narrow or shift a one-block-long section of Nelson Street, but other than that, there seems to be room on the north side.
    Last edited by Komiksulo; 2012-Jul-11 at 23:55.

  10. #2035

    Default

    There's been rumours in the past that OBRY would abandon Streetsville-Brampton and connect with CN rather than CP at Brampton (CP still owns the track and serves the customers between Streetsville Jct and Highway 401. It would eliminate what is otherwise redundant trackage to just connect with CP, but nothing came of that. Yes, long term plans would require Brampton's station building to be moved 10-20 metres to the north, but I prefer the Railroad Street 3rd track myself as well, as the new second platform could easily be modified for a third track.

    I wish that the CN/CP bypass via the 407 "Greenbelt" was built, but that ship has all but sailed at this point. It would have freed up both GO's routes through Mississauga and Brampton.

  11. #2036

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShonTron View Post
    There's been rumours in the past that OBRY would abandon Streetsville-Brampton and connect with CN rather than CP at Brampton (CP still owns the track and serves the customers between Streetsville Jct and Highway 401. It would eliminate what is otherwise redundant trackage to just connect with CP, but nothing came of that. Yes, long term plans would require Brampton's station building to be moved 10-20 metres to the north, but I prefer the Railroad Street 3rd track myself as well, as the new second platform could easily be modified for a third track.
    I hope that route is never completely abandoned. It would be very useful for regional rail!

    I wish that the CN/CP bypass via the 407 "Greenbelt" was built, but that ship has all but sailed at this point. It would have freed up both GO's routes through Mississauga and Brampton.
    Has the ship sailed? Has something happened that would make it more difficult to build? It makes a huge amount of sense as a project, since the section through downtown Brampton would be very difficult to widen sufficiently. The only problem I can see would be the loss of direct connections to some of the major industries in Brampton.

  12. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unimaginative2 View Post
    I hope that route is never completely abandoned. It would be very useful for regional rail!
    If you're referring to the Brampton-Orangeville stretch, no, it probably wouldn't be particularly useful. Slow, windy track, to a small town that has far too little population to justify very limited commuter-type GO train service much less proper regional rail. In order to get Orangeville's population up to a level where you could even start contemplating a few commuter trains a day, you'd need to get it to sprawl all over the greenbelt.

    I guess you could conceive of a situation where the lower Brampton-Mississauga stretch was turned over to an LRT or O-Train-type operation of some nature, but I dunno if the route really has much by way of a healthy built-in ridership.... it mostly runs through low-density sprawl, although I guess with a bit of new track at each end you could connect downtown Brampton with the newish employment lands near the 401 and Derry.

  13. #2038

    Default

    I was mainly referring to the Brampton to Mississauga stretch. It's a great route that connects central Mississauga to Downtown Brampton, and it also serves the Meadowvale Business Park.

  14. #2039
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mississauga, where cars rule city growth
    Posts
    7,821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShonTron View Post
    There's been rumours in the past that OBRY would abandon Streetsville-Brampton and connect with CN rather than CP at Brampton (CP still owns the track and serves the customers between Streetsville Jct and Highway 401. It would eliminate what is otherwise redundant trackage to just connect with CP, but nothing came of that. Yes, long term plans would require Brampton's station building to be moved 10-20 metres to the north, but I prefer the Railroad Street 3rd track myself as well, as the new second platform could easily be modified for a third track.

    I wish that the CN/CP bypass via the 407 "Greenbelt" was built, but that ship has all but sailed at this point. It would have freed up both GO's routes through Mississauga and Brampton.
    Not enough room on the south side to get the 3rd track in for the new platform unless you take down that office building and narrow Railroad St to a one way street. It could be done by rebuilding a new bridge to support the 3rd track as well removing the exit to Main St.

    Moving the exist station is no problem, but the area west of the station will cause problems for the existing complex. Then Mill St would have to be close at some future date.

    As for CP tracks, doing a fly under is out of the question due to cost as well low traffic.

    Running a GO line to Orangeville would have to come off the Milton line if a 3rd track went in at Brampton as there would be no room for a cut off from the Georgetown Line to the Orangeville line without crossing the other tracks.
    Due Time restriction, visit my site https://www.flickr.com/photos/drum118/ to see updated photos of projects shot the last few weeks since I don't have the time to post them to various threads.
    See my videos on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/user/Transitdrum118/videos

  15. #2040
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mississauga, where cars rule city growth
    Posts
    7,821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Platform 27 View Post
    If you're referring to the Brampton-Orangeville stretch, no, it probably wouldn't be particularly useful. Slow, windy track, to a small town that has far too little population to justify very limited commuter-type GO train service much less proper regional rail. In order to get Orangeville's population up to a level where you could even start contemplating a few commuter trains a day, you'd need to get it to sprawl all over the greenbelt.

    I guess you could conceive of a situation where the lower Brampton-Mississauga stretch was turned over to an LRT or O-Train-type operation of some nature, but I dunno if the route really has much by way of a healthy built-in ridership.... it mostly runs through low-density sprawl, although I guess with a bit of new track at each end you could connect downtown Brampton with the newish employment lands near the 401 and Derry.
    They do it over here in Europe without problems.

    To service Orangeville, you run a different type of service with shorter trains. I have been on EmU's with 2 cars that carry very few riders over the 90 minute route. Even been on 2 cars DMU between Glasgow and Edinburgh Scotland as well 5 cars where service is every 15 minutes. Some of those trains are express well others are milk runs with various other service in between.

    Having a GO line to Orangeville would offer better transit service to Mississauga, Meadowvale and Brampton, as well Orangeville. Would take a number of cars off the road. Can see 6 station for the line not including the Milton Line.
    Due Time restriction, visit my site https://www.flickr.com/photos/drum118/ to see updated photos of projects shot the last few weeks since I don't have the time to post them to various threads.
    See my videos on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/user/Transitdrum118/videos

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •