News   Mar 28, 2024
 976     2 
News   Mar 28, 2024
 548     2 
News   Mar 28, 2024
 843     0 

Why to support the Liberal Party

Brandon716

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
1,428
Reaction score
0
Location
Niagara Region
I started playing around with federal debt numbers after listening to David Frum babble about how horrible Trudeau was for Canada... Turns out Mulroney expanded debt far more than Trudeau.

Here are a few stats to view for federal debt in Canada.

Year - Debt (in $Millions)
1970 - $20,293
1980 - $91,948
1985 - exceeded $200,000
1988 - exceeded $300,000
1992 - exceeded $400,000
1994 - exceeded $500,000
2006 - $457,000
Today/2011 - $535,000

Debt extended between 1970 and 1984 (largely Liberal and Liberal/NDP rule, save for the Joe Clark period), total: $180 billion over a nearly 15 year period. Seems more than reasonable given how much Canada's economy grew and how many accomplishments occurred under Trudeau.

Debt extended between 1985 and 1994 after 9 years of Mulroney/Tory rule, total: $300 billion, absolutely asinine for what Mulroney didn't accomplish and for the massive recession his government presided over at the end of his term.

Under Chretien and Martin, the Liberals inherited the worst modern recession in Canadian history after the Tories and Mulroney, yet they turned the federal budget around and reduced it to $450 billion by the time 2006 rolled around, just in time for Jack Layton to pull the plug and give Harper a minority government.

Now Canada is back up nearly $100 billion more in debt in 5 years, has weathered another recession largely foreign induced, and Harper's government wants to brag that he is a financial whiz who doesn't need a pesky election to risk his stable government?

And the Tories want to complain and whine about Trudeau's deficits, which were $120 billion less over a longer 17 year period vs the 9 years of Mulroney??

The results are what people want them to be, I think Liberals delivered a lot during their recent 13 years of power.

Liberal accomplishment after 1993:

*Debt reduction, and nearly a decade of surplus budgets

*Under Liberal management, the economy went from an inherited massive recession in the early 1990's to consistent jobs growth across Canada throughout the entire period Liberals were in power. While the government doesn't create every job, it does show the old Liberal corporate tax rate of 28% was competitive to the point that business development was solid. The reduction to 15% by the Harper Conservatives is simply a freebie giveaway to big business.

*Liberals insisted on and kept proper bank and housing regulations via the CMHC and rules on Canadian banks. These rules effectively banned the same kinds of derivatives investing and mortgage bundling that happened in the states and throughout European nations. Liberal leadership kept Canadians from experiencing the same fallout from the global recession of 2007/2008, and has assisted Canada in exiting that recession more quickly than any other G20 nation.

*Liberals kept Canada out of Iraq in 2003, and that prudent leadership secured Canada's place on the world stage of a responsible peacekeeper, not a warmonger nation as has occurred south of the border and across the pond in the UK with the disaster led by George Bush and Tony Blair.

*Liberals led Canada through the 1995 Quebec referendum, much like Trudeau stood so strongly against separatism in the past through the terrorist acts of decades past. Sponsorship may have been a boondoggle scandal, but much of that $100 million was spent trying to advertise Canada to Quebecers and to promote a comfortable Quebec within a strong Canadian federation. The program may have had contracts go to Liberal friends, but it was a genuine effort of a truly national party wanting to keep Canada united and strong. Liberal leadership on this issue led to the Clarity Act passed in 2000, which further increased strength of Quebec within a larger Canadian system. What the Liberals did not do is use the issue as a cheap campaign tactic as an entitlement to a majority as Harper is doing in 2011.

*Liberals forged the Health Accord of 2004 to increase health spending and assist provinces to secure public health care for a decade starting in 2004. After balancing Canada's books, the Liberals were responsible for securing the future of Canada's publicly funded universal health care system for the next generation.

*Paul Martin and the Liberal Chretien administration single handedly saved the CPP for another generation and well beyond any reasonable forecast for many decades into the future, far beyond the life expectancy of most people today.

*Liberals stood up for human rights and Canada became the largest land mass on Earth to recognize the next era of human rights: Gay Marriage and equality. Canada is the largest beacon on this next frontier of human rights while so many other nations drag their feet with civil unions or other sub-standard, separate-but-equal laws, or no equality at all. It wouldn't have happened without Liberal leadership and Liberal appointments to the courts.

*Liberals may not have a good environmental record from actual results, but the party put in a good effort to implement Kyoto and signed onto it while the US government abandoned it during the early Bush years. The Liberals get an "E" for effort on this one, only one party stood up and signed a resolution and negotiated on behalf of Kyoto. That party was the Liberal party. Elizabeth May can get up on stage and whine, Jack Layton can posture, despite the fact that his party is filled with union workers who work for dirty industries and therefore he has a vested interest against paying real attention to the issue. The Liberal party still ratified Kyoto in 2002 (click here for source), in an era where the US was headed in reverse on the issue. If Elizabeth May wants to posture that she has the strength and ability to stand up to Alberta when an established party like the Liberals had a hard enough time, I'd like to know why any pretentious voter would ever waste a vote for the Greens when there is a difference between action and words. Liberals made a solid, honest attempt at advancing the environment and lost an entire election on it in 2008 with Dion's Green Shift. The Liberal party has invested 10x more real energy in pro-environmental causes than the lame NDP has. It was willing to lose an election in 2008 over the issue, and that is real political capital that was spent while the whining opposition parties do nothing but complain. Just to put the nail in the coffin on this issue, the Green Party leader herself admitted in 2008 that Stephane Dion should be Prime Minister at the time. She's on record (click here).


*The Chretien Liberals proceeded with social freedom policies, such as promoting legalization of small amounts of marijuana. While we all have differing opinions on what constitutes good standards, the clear trend with the Liberal party is that it stands on a firm foundation based on human rights, democracy, and free individual liberty. The Conservatives can't claim this, the NDP can't deliver this.

*Liberals had just finished negotiating a federal deal to have universal child care when Jack Layton pulled the plug in 2006. Liberal accomplishment destroyed by the NDP...

The list of Liberal accomplishment is long and proud, to say the Liberals are arrogant or incapable of delivering change is a joke to me. The party created Canada public health care on a national level, the party created the CPP for retirement security, the party is responsible for the era that brought the Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Liberals are responsible for taking a balanced approach to the economy, taxing wealth and delivering programs for people, and accelerating expenses when possible. The party has delivered on human rights.

I'm tired of hearing the Liberals are corrupt because of one scandal (sponsorship) and that they don't do anything. They are responsible for the bedrock of Canadian society from the Charter to public health care.

There is only one serious party that can effect changes that aren't in line with the Harper vision. The serious opposition is the Liberal Party. What voters need to remember next Monday is that the reason why Harper is in power is because of Jack Layton and the NDP, so why reward the NDP?
 
Also, why is the media giving the Conservatives a pass on massive corruption and fraud?

Let's put this in perspective: The Liberals had a scandal that began and ended in the late 90's, early 00's revolving around Sponsorship. It was a scandal where approximately $100 million in funds were paid to Liberal friendly companies to process a program that was designed to combat against Quebec separatism. The issue got heated largely because of the explosive topic: separatism. But the scandal was pretty typical quid pro quo political fare. Sure, it was wrong, but not all of the $100 million was wasted, and it was spent over a series of years and not all at once.

The response? The entire Canadian media establishment had it as a top story for nearly two years running, they ran the Liberal party into the ground, and it has created this public concept that the Liberals are somehow more corrupt than any other party, yet they aren't.

FFW to today, and you will see massive Conservative scandal from even before they took power. The very ads the Conservatives ran in winter 2006 were paid for by fraudulent, money laundered dollars that went above election spending limit rules because of the In and Out scandal. The media spent maybe a few weeks on the issue before putting it on the backburner, and it constituted millions of waste.

Then we have the G20 and G8 waste, which is just the tip of the iceberg. Over $50 million was spent in Tony Clement's district for one individual project that had absolutely nothing to do with security or the G8/G20, and that was just one line of pure scandal. It was all spent in a rush in one budget, for a one time event.

The Star reports that the G20 in Pittsburgh cost the US $12.2 million (with a tiny m, not a b); whereas, the Canadian government spent $1.2 billion for the G8/G20 summits in Huntsville and Toronto.

Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/tor...8--g20-canada-s-billion-dollar-summit-mystery

Can anyone tell me why the Conservatives had election fraud, where they ran ads against the Liberals, against so-called "massive Liberal corruption" using money laundered funds and it goes unreported after a few weeks? Can anyone tell me why the Cons have hundreds of millions in wasted money over the G20, and the Canadian media establishment are giving them a relative pass, after briefly mentioning it?

If the Liberals were destroyed after sponsorship was pounded on for two years, why do the Conservatives get such a pass?
 
The three top reasons Canadians have decided not to vote Liberal:

1. Paul Martin
2. Stephane Dion
3. Michael Ignatieff

Need any more be said?
 
I agree with Tewder (with the exception of Paul Martin...I think people still like him), but I really don't understand it.

I've always thought that Canada was a "vote for the party, not your MP" sort of place, and I especially don't understand voting (or not voting) for a party solely because of its leader. It's clear that Stephen Harper runs a tight ship with the Conservatives, so obviously you do have to be aware of his opinions on matters (and the same with other leaders to varying extents), but a lot of people seem to be voting based on their impression of a party leader's 'charisma' or how much they like him some other such criterion that makes pretty much no difference at all to how the country's going to be run.

Like those attack ads on Ignatieff... "Nobody speaks for the Liberal party but me"...um, yeah, he is the leader of the party. That's sort of what being the leader is all about. But the ad really resonates with people for some reason. What happened to actually voting for a party based on its stance on the issues? I like the Conservative policies in certain areas (lowered corporate taxes) but also hate the fact that they (in my opinion more than any other party) seem so intent on winning that they'll also implement absolutely terrible policies for the country as long as they please the masses (GST cut), please their supporters and leave the rest of the country largely indifferent (ludicrous cost estimates on the jet contract, "tough on crime" mentality when crime's generally decreasing), or satisfy some sort of strange libertarian agenda while flying right over the heads of most people (long-form census).

Of a generally mediocre lot, I'll be voting Liberal.
 
As bad as the Liberal party is... Read Armageddon Factor by Marci Macdonald. It’s a pretty worrisome look at the Harper cabal. Apparently there’s a whole stream of evangelical thought that says Canada is going to be the location of the return/rapture/whathaveyou, and those believers are in government.

Stockwell Day is an out-there homeschooler who got in trouble with the Alberta government for teaching crazy textbooks at his private school. That’s how he got his political career started apparently; that whole Big Brother Government is persecuting my right to inculcate children with crazy things.

Marci does a pretty good job of making connections (like that James May show). It’s a who’s who of devout, devout, devout Christians in every orifice of government. People that send prayer waves/bombs during the house of commons’ sitting from the gallery and the like.
 
The three top reasons Canadians have decided not to vote Liberal:

1. Paul Martin
2. Stephane Dion
3. Michael Ignatieff

Need any more be said?

Well, just one thing,- one of the top reasons 2/3's of the electorate could never support the Conservatives is Harper.
 
Well, just one thing,- one of the top reasons 2/3's of the electorate could never support the Conservatives is Harper.

Granted, except when you consider where the Conservative party was post-Mulroney it is hard to deny that Harper has been building votes while Martin, Dion and Ignatieff have been losing them.
 
As bad as the Liberal party is... Read Armageddon Factor by Marci Macdonald. It’s a pretty worrisome look at the Harper cabal. Apparently there’s a whole stream of evangelical thought that says Canada is going to be the location of the return/rapture/whathaveyou, and those believers are in government.

Stockwell Day is an out-there homeschooler who got in trouble with the Alberta government for teaching crazy textbooks at his private school. That’s how he got his political career started apparently; that whole Big Brother Government is persecuting my right to inculcate children with crazy things.

Marci does a pretty good job of making connections (like that James May show). It’s a who’s who of devout, devout, devout Christians in every orifice of government. People that send prayer waves/bombs during the house of commons’ sitting from the gallery and the like.

What's your problem with Christians?
 

Back
Top