Search results

Are you serious? Do you not see the irony? You not tolerating the "intolerant" is intolerance. In other words, you only tolerate those you agree with, which isn't really tolerance at all. Gay people already are 'tolerated', they're just not entirely 'affirmed.' Tolerance is a must...

What does Caribana have to do with Pride? I'm sure there is enough lewd conduct at Caribana; though I'm not sure if there is barenakedness. I really doubt it. Lewd conduct at any event or place should be dealt with by the police. You know that will never happen at Pride, however, because...

What a farce this world has become. The ironic thing is, those that approve of Pride will claim to be tolerant people; so long as you affirm their sexuality. Where is the tolerance for people with differing views? One isn't tolerant unless they accept the right for those they disagree with to...

What he should have asked is, "How many lewd conduct charges are handed out at Pride?"

We already have a plethora of restaurants that meet your pretentious desires. There's nothing wrong with some American food here. The majority of the people that use the square probably don't have palettes that are as sophisticated as yours.

*Burger (It's singular).

So do I.

I'm a suburbanite, and I care about a pretty public realm. I'm definitely in the minority, however.

Who cares if Jane Jacobs hated University Avenue? That doesn't mean you can't like it.

I highly doubt that will happen. I don't think there will be any rooftop lighting either.

You're absolutely right about that. Why is this such a big problem in Toronto though? There was a time, not too long ago, where we actually cared about the way the city looked. What happened and when?

Excellent. Another facade job for a heritage building. This better not go ahead.

This tower just doesn't do it for me. The top of the south end of the tower was handled poorly, but the quality of glass and mullions is what ruins this one for me. This tower should have had Delta quality curtain wall, all around.

It's not complete.

More people moving downtown doesn't necessarily mean, 'prettier public realm'. The suburbs have been growing for ages and still look like junk.

You've proven yourself to be a useless contributor to this conversation. When asked for a serious answer, you resort to personality attacks. You know Trudeau is in the wrong, but you're too stubborn to admit it; thus you deflect the topic. Stay on point. Thanks for showing yourself as the...

doug, you're like the Claude Lemieux of Urban Toronto; just trying to get under peoples skin. Too bad for you, I'm hip to your game. Why are you deflecting? You're smarter than that. What does Rob Ford have to do with Justin Trudeau? Why is this man not a journalist? Is it because he's...

We should just redo all our sidewalks with asphalt paving. That way whenever they need to be patched up, they'll look more uniform. Or maybe then they'd be patched with cement?

Which is exactly why I don't want the Oxford buildings built in their proposed location. They would utterly ruin the presence of the CN Tower. It's baffling that such tall towers could possibly be approved that close to it.

Why do people refer to crappy looking condos as "suburban?" They're just as common downtown.