Search results

The focus on this "gap" issue seems to be entirely on the Charlie side but one could ask, assuming GG didn't own the Charlie site at the time, whether the Hudson should have been built with significant windows positioned where there was every possibility of this happening. And, if one were of...

"There is very little amenities offered." Which means less chance condo fees will be hiked in the future to maintain them.

Let me get this right. You think that an unelected and entirely unaccountable body swayed by whatever interests can buy the most convincing consultants and who are given the power to overturn the wishes of planning departments who are overseen by and take direction from a democratically elected...

Well, the "Cancel Transit City" biline says all we need to know about the level of understanding of urban issues being brought to bear here, doesn't it?

That's the logic for transfer slabs but I'm pretty sure that six feet thick is way beyond what would ever be called for in that scenario.

Someone else help us out here! I can't imagine any structural rationale for a 6 foot thick slab.

Airbag- regarding cdr108's reply to your chimney issue: if I'm not mistaken the chimney is in the rear section of the lot east of Six50 on King. The 525 Adelaide project is to the north and east of the Six50 site. It is a huge building and if it goes ahead as proposed won't be blocking...