News   Apr 24, 2024
 257     0 
News   Apr 24, 2024
 435     0 
News   Apr 24, 2024
 468     0 

PM Justin Trudeau's Canada

Good job, Liberals. Diversity for diversity's sake.

In a field like this that demands skill, the focus should be on equality of opportunity, not equality of results.

Universities introducing term limits for Canada Research Chairs to meet diversity targets
Many universities across Canada are introducing term limits for their Canada Research Chairs to get new academics into the jobs as the prestigious program struggles to meet diversity targets set by a court settlement.

The Canada Research Chairs gives annual funding of $100,000 or $200,000 to successful academics for research projects. The program is divided into Tier 1 chairs, who have seven-year terms that can be renewed indefinitely, and Tier 2 chairs, who have five-year terms that can be renewed once. Federal granting councils allocate the 1,600 chairs among universities, and the schools nominate academics to fill those positions.

The federal government told universities in May that they had until Dec. 15 to write an action plan on how to boost the diversity of their nominees, and another 18 to 24 months to follow through on those plans, or they could lose their research chair funding.

Because of a 2006 legal settlement, the Canada Research Chairs (CRC) program was obligated to set equity targets that match the number of academics eligible for the positions. For instance, 31 per cent of chairs are supposed to go to women, but in data from 2015 and 2016, fewer than 28 per cent of chairs were female. Universities have generally failed to meet the targets, but the government has only begun to threaten to enforce them in the past year.

The other three groups are visible minorities (15 per cent), Indigenous people (1 per cent), and people with a disability (4 per cent).


https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/ne...rs-to-meet-diversity-targets/article36579759/
 
Amazing how dishonest and corrupt these Liberals can be:

Morneau told former company he would use blind trust


https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...er-failure-to-put-assets-in-blind-trusts.html

Trudeau put his own personal investments into a blind trust in 2013 after becoming Liberal leader, proclaiming that he’d set “the gold standard” for ethical conduct. The day he was appointed to cabinet in 2015, Morneau told reporters he expected to do the same with his holdings.

The Conservatives and NDP alike say there is an enormous conflict created by a finance minister regulating an industry that includes a company in which he owns some $40 million in shares.
 
Name me a political party that hasn't been corrupt in some way.

Anyway, do people have predictions for the two by-elections on Monday? I am fairly certain that Sturgeon River-Parkland is CPC hold, but Lac-Saint-Jean could flip.
 
News like this will surely encourage more to try their luck.

New data show 69% of illegal border-crossers are being granted asylum
The acceptance rate for the border-crossers is even higher than the 63-per-cent overall rate for asylum-seekers in 2016.
A recent Ipsos poll found many Canadians doubted if border-crossers are legitimate refugees, with 67 per cent saying these migrants were trying to bypass the legal immigration process.

A separate poll by Angus Reid found that 57 per cent of respondents disapproved of Ottawa’s handling of the border-crossers, with 53 per cent of the participants in the survey saying Canada was being “too generous” to the asylum-seekers.

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...border-crossers-are-being-granted-asylum.html
 
I don't recall the last time a finance minister owned shares in a pension company while making pension policy. So much for his conflict of interest "screen".
It's like the Conservative corruption is measure in thousands of dollars and the Liberal corruption in the millions.
They both have faults, but the Liberals ones are consistently orders of magnitude worse.

The continuation of this Morneau story is that Bank of Canada (which is in his portfolio) signed a contract with Morneau Shepell for pension services.

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/10/20/tories-pile-on-morneau-after-bank-of-canada-contract-revelation

Then came the Sun report that Bank of Canada has a relationship with Morneau Shepell, managing the pension and benefit plans for its employees.

A Bank of Canada spokesperson confirmed that the contract was renewed on February 27, 2017, under Morneau’s watch and while he was still a beneficiary of the company.

So not only did Morneau pass legislation that helps his company and continue to have an active contract between gov't and his company - but he also extended that contract.
 
It's like the Conservative corruption is measure in thousands of dollars and the Liberal corruption in the millions.
They both have faults, but the Liberals ones are consistently orders of magnitude worse.

The continuation of this Morneau story is that Bank of Canada (which is in his portfolio) signed a contract with Morneau Shepell for pension services.

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/10/20/tories-pile-on-morneau-after-bank-of-canada-contract-revelation



So not only did Morneau pass legislation that helps his company and continue to have an active contract between gov't and his company - but he also extended that contract.
There is likely not a better example of Conflict of Interest since the Act was passed.

DMnZetbW4AEQHAP.jpg
 
Morneau is nothing like Jim Flaherty and Paul Martin who been perhaps more conservative but at least was a real finance minister, unlike Morneau.

Good finance ministers like Flaherty and Martin were really powerful figures and one could say almost seen as the number 2 in command. They could be so influential that they could actually go against thier own leader or party on policy.

Morneau is none of those things and frankly is corrupt and unethical as well.

Time for him to resign he inspires no confidence.
 
What about Joe Oliver? He was only the third sitting finance minister to lose his seat and now works with the far right Rebel Media.
 
What about Joe Oliver? He was only the third sitting finance minister to lose his seat and now works with the far right Rebel Media.
Oliver was ok, but based on only 18 months and 1 budget, it is hard to say he was excellent.

On the other hand, Flaherty and Martin (despite his own not-so blind trust scandal, and the closing tax havens of businesses in Liberia when his ships were generally registered in Bahamas) really did a good job for Canada.
 
What about Joe Oliver? He was only the third sitting finance minister to lose his seat and now works with the far right Rebel Media.

Yes my guy is not that bad because another guy from the other side sucked to... Very grown-up debate :)


Joe Oliver was not very good but he did not ethical issues.

I think Trudeau lack of a strong finance minister will become an albatross if the deficits continue to grow or the economy slows down.
 
Yes my guy is not that bad because another guy from the other side sucked to... Very grown-up debate :)


Joe Oliver was not very good but he did not ethical issues.

I think Trudeau lack of a strong finance minister will become an albatross if the deficits continue to grow or the economy slows down.
Oh, I thought Jasmine as saying that Oliver did a good job and deserves to be mentioned along with Flaherty and Martin. He did bring in income splitting - which was great for lower-middle class where 1 spouse works part time to assist with the kids. He also balanced the budget, was honest, and no ethical breaches.

Some thinks that not getting re-elected is a sign that he did a poor job. Wow, I guess if you don't have time to study issues you might believe it.
 

Back
Top